The name is absent



which means a* = 0 or:

<i(t) =


--------x(t) (eɪnɪ + С2П2) -
n1 + n2


b+ρ-


2x(t)
(x
2(t) + 1)2


=0


And so the steady-state Pareto-optimal solution is:

(nɪ + n2) b + ρ -  25)

*
a*


(x2(t)+1)

(19)


2x(t) (eɪnɪ + n2c2)

3.2 Graph and Analysis of the Steady-state Dynamic Pareto-
optimal Solution

This solution can be plotted in the (x,a)-plane together with the phase plot for
the steady-states of the lake when dx/dt = 0, given by equation (3). The inter-
section of the two curves gives society’s optimal phosphorous loading solution.
Using the hysteretic lake value b = 0.6, ρ = 0.03, n
ɪ = 2, n2 = 2, c1 = 0.2 and
c
2 = 2, the graphs intersect at (x*, a*) = (0.3472, 0.1007), as shown in Figure 1
below, thus giving us the Pareto-optimal steady-state equilibrium. Note that
this result is below the point at which the lake flips from an oligotrophic to a
eutrophic state, i.e. for the selected constants, society prefers an oligotrophic
lake.

Figure 1: Pareto-optimal Loading with Two Welfare Functions


10




More intriguing information

1. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
2. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
3. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
4. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
8. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
9. The name is absent
10. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments