which means a* = 0 or:
<i(t) =
--------x(t) (eɪnɪ + С2П2) -
n1 + n2
b+ρ-
2x(t)
(x2(t) + 1)2
=0
And so the steady-state Pareto-optimal solution is:
(nɪ + n2) b + ρ - 25)
*
a*
(x2(t)+1)
(19)
2x(t) (eɪnɪ + n2c2)
3.2 Graph and Analysis of the Steady-state Dynamic Pareto-
optimal Solution
This solution can be plotted in the (x,a)-plane together with the phase plot for
the steady-states of the lake when dx/dt = 0, given by equation (3). The inter-
section of the two curves gives society’s optimal phosphorous loading solution.
Using the hysteretic lake value b = 0.6, ρ = 0.03, nɪ = 2, n2 = 2, c1 = 0.2 and
c2 = 2, the graphs intersect at (x*, a*) = (0.3472, 0.1007), as shown in Figure 1
below, thus giving us the Pareto-optimal steady-state equilibrium. Note that
this result is below the point at which the lake flips from an oligotrophic to a
eutrophic state, i.e. for the selected constants, society prefers an oligotrophic
lake.

Figure 1: Pareto-optimal Loading with Two Welfare Functions
10
More intriguing information
1. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders2. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
3. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
4. The name is absent
5. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
6. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
7. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
8. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent