Table 4: Size, Power and Frequency Distribution of the number of change-points obtained
with the Kokoszka and Leipus (2000) test when there are two breaks at 0.33T and 0.67T of the
sample in the GARCH process.
|
Samples, T Returns Number of Breaks |
0 |
( rt ) 2 12 |
1000 ≥30 |
|rt| 12 |
≥3 |
0 |
( rt ) 2 12 |
3000 ≥30 |
|rt| 12 |
≥3 | ||||||
|
HA : Break in the dynamics of volatility with parameters (β0, β1, β2) | ||||||||||||||||
|
DGP1: | ||||||||||||||||
|
(0.5,0.6,0.8) |
0.00 |
0.88 |
0.01 |
0.11 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.87 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
0.87 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
(0.5,0.6,0.3) |
0.00 |
0.60 |
0.39 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
DGP2: | ||||||||||||||||
|
(0.8,0.5,0.8) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
HB : Break in the constant of volatility with parameters (ω 0, ω 1, ω 2) | ||||||||||||||||
|
DGP1: | ||||||||||||||||
|
(0.4,0.5,0.8) |
0.00 |
0.39 |
0.61 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
0.29 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
(0.4,0.8,0.4) |
0.00 |
0.53 |
0.39 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.77 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
0.66 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
|
DGP2: | ||||||||||||||||
|
(0.1,0.2,0.5) |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
(0.1,0.5,0.8) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
(0.1,0.5,0.1) |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
(0.1,0.3,0.1) |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.78 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.97 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
|
H1C : Break in |
the variance |
of the |
error |
with parameters (σ |
u0,σu |
1, σ U 2 ) | ||||||||||
|
DGP1: | ||||||||||||||||
|
(0,1.5,3) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
(0,3,5) |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
Notes: The K&L test (see notes in Table 1) is applied following a sequential sample segmentation approach and the frequency
distribution of the change-points is reported. The highlighted numbers refer to the true number of breaks in the simulated process.
27
More intriguing information
1. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments2. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
3. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
4. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
5. The name is absent
6. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
7. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector
8. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
9. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
10. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity