Table 5: Size, Power and Frequency Distribution of the number of change-points obtained
with the Lavielle and Moulines (2000) test when there are two breaks at 0.33T and 0.67T of the
sample in the GARCH process.
|
Samples, T Lavielle & Moulines |
1000 1000 BIC LWZ BIC LWZ |
|
Returns |
( rt )2 |rt| |
|
Number of Breaks |
012≥3012≥3012≥3012≥3 |
|
Segments tk |
HA : Break in the dynamics of volatility with parameters (β0, β1, β2) |
DGP1:
|
(0.5,0.6,0.8) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.95 |
0.05 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.97 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.98 |
0.00 |
0.00 | |
|
(0.5,0.6,0.3) |
5 |
0.14 |
0.47 |
0.39 |
0.00 |
0.94 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.16 |
0.56 |
0.28 |
0.00 |
0.93 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.20 |
0.50 |
0.28 |
0.00 |
0.97 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
0.62 |
0.19 |
0.00 |
0.96 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 | |
|
DGP2: | |||||||||||||||||
|
(0.8,0.5,0.8) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.90 |
0.06 |
0.70 |
0.19 |
0.11 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.36 |
0.06 |
0.58 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.03 |
0.97 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.68 |
0.32 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.51 |
0.08 |
0.41 |
0.00 |
HB : Break in the constant of volatility with parameters (ω0, ω 1, ω2)
DGP1:
|
(0.4,0.5,0.8) |
5 3 |
0.05 0.02 |
0.91 0.97 |
0.04 0.01 |
0.00 0.00 |
0.66 0.52 |
0.34 0.48 |
0.00 0.00 |
0.00 0.00 |
0.04 0.05 |
0.94 0.94 |
0.02 0.01 |
0.00 0.00 |
0.63 0.69 |
0.37 0.31 |
0.00 0.00 |
0.00 0.00 |
|
(0.4,0.8,0.4) |
5 |
0.09 |
0.00 |
0.90 |
0.01 |
0.92 |
0.00 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
0.02 |
0.89 |
0.00 |
0.92 |
0.00 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.00 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
0.90 |
0.00 |
0.97 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.00 | |
|
DGP2: | |||||||||||||||||
|
(0.1,0.2,0.5) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.82 |
0.18 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.67 |
0.30 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.09 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.72 |
0.28 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 | |
|
(0.1,0.5,0.8) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.18 |
0.79 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.36 |
0.60 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.96 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.00 |
0.20 |
0.80 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.34 |
0.66 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.91 |
0.09 |
0.00 | |
|
(0.1,0.5,0.1) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.95 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.94 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.00 | |
|
(0.1,0.3,0.1) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.99 |
0.01 |
0.77 |
0.00 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.93 |
0.03 |
0.75 |
0.02 |
0.23 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.97 |
0.00 |
0.68 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.96 |
0.00 |
0.71 |
0.02 |
0.27 |
0.00 | |
|
H1C |
: Break in the variance of the error with parameters (σu0, |
σu1,σu2) | |||||||||||||||
|
DGP1: | |||||||||||||||||
|
(0,1.5,3) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.78 |
0.22 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.37 |
0.56 |
0.07 |
0.00 |
0.96 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
|
3 |
0.00 |
0.97 |
0.03 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.53 |
0.47 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 | |
|
(0,3,5) |
5 |
0.00 |
0.76 |
0.24 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.96 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.81 |
0.19 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
|
3 |
0.00 |
0.96 |
0.04 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 | |
28
More intriguing information
1. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA2. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
3. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
4. The name is absent
5. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
6. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
7. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
8. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
9. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
10. The name is absent