Under Hi
n 1/2B(m) → c(m)
{∑∫=1 Lj(1, O) f∞oo [(fj(s) - gj(s,α*)) wj(s) exp (mjΦ(s))] ds}
ς2(m, a*)
and in view of Theorem 1 and Lemma 3 c(m) > O a.s. and almost everywhere with
respect to A.
Proof of Lemma 5:
(i) Let Kn(a,m) = n 1/4 ɪɪi (yt — g(xt,a')') W(¾m). Then, the mean value
theorem gives
Kn(a,m) — Kn(ao,m) = n 1/2Kn(a(m),m)n1/4 (a — ao) , (Al)
where supmeM ∣∣α(m) — ao∣∣ ≤ ∣∣a — ao∣∣ = op(1). Also let
J ρ∞
A(ao, m)
xj(1,O) / <⅛j(
s, aoj)wj(s) exp (mj∙Φ(s)) ds.
j=1 7 c
Next
sup
meM
n 11Kn(a(m),m) — A(ao,m)
= ⅛(1),
(A2)
by Theorem 3.2 of Park and Phillips (2001). By (Al) and (A2) we therefore have
sup ∖∣Kn(a,m) — Kn(ao,m) + A(ao,m)n1/4 (a — ao)∣∣ = op(1). (A3)
meM
Also note that
sup
meM
n
n1/4 (a — ao) — C(ao)-1n-1/4 g(xt, ao)ut
t=1
= ⅛(1).
(A4)
Now (A3) and (A4) give
sup
meM
Kn(a,m) — Zn (m) y∕ς 2(m)
= ⅛(1).
(A5)
Next note that
(A6)
sup ∣ς2(m) — ς2(m)∣ = op(1),
meM
by Theorem 3.2 of Park and Phillips (2001). Now the result follows by (A5) and (A6)
and the assumption that infmeM ς2(m) > O.
(ii) By Theorem 8.2 of Billingsley (1968), the following conditions are sufficient
for the requisite result:
19
More intriguing information
1. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control2. Insurance within the firm
3. The name is absent
4. Monetary Discretion, Pricing Complementarity and Dynamic Multiple Equilibria
5. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
6. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
7. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
8. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
9. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
10. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce