= 2

1 {|M_a|<gn}CT4(u)Lχ(r, u)du
f∞∞ 1 {∣u-a∣<ξn}LX (1 ,u )d u
''
Lχ(r, a)da + θa.s.(1)
= 2

a.s. 2
1 {∣zξn∣<ξn}σ4( a + zξn ) LX ( r, a + zξn )d z
f∞∞ 1 {∣zξn∣<ξn}LX(1, a + zξn)dz
Lχ(r, a)da + oa,s. (1)
Proof of Step 4:
Z∞
-∞
Lχ(r, a)2
MM d a.
(20)
Cn,r
1 L (n_ 1) rJ
l σ 2( Xs )d s
0
√= £ σ2(Xi/n) --n
V n
i =1
1 l ( n_ 1)rJ l ( n_ 1)rJ ∕∙( i+1) /n
-= £ σ2(Xi/n) -√n £ I σ2(Xs)ds
nn i =1 i =1 7i/n
l ( n_ 1)rJ r( i+1) /n
n £
i=1 i/n
(σ 2( Xi/n )
- σ2(Xs)) ds
(21)
and, given the Lipschitz assumption on σ2(∙), the last line in (21) is oP(1) by the same
argument as the one used in Step 1.
Given Steps 1-4 above, it follows that the quadratic variation process of Zn,r is given by
2 [∞ σ4 (a) Lx(r, a)da + 2 [∞ σ4 (a) Lχ(^ a).2 da - 4 [∞ σ4 (a) Lχ(^ a).2 da
-∞ -∞ LX (1, a) -
∞ LX (1, a)
= 2 [∞ σ4 (a) Lχ(r, a)(LX(1,a) - Lχ(r, a)) da. (22)
∞ -QQ LX (1 ,a)
The statement in the theorem then follows.
(i)b Without loss of generality, suppose that r < r'. By noting that
1 l ( n_ 1)rJ l ( n_ 1)rJ
-= £ sn (Xi/n ) -√n £ (Xi+1 /n - Xi/n )2
nn i=1 i =1
1 [( n_ 1) r' ] [( n_ 1) r' ]
= — £ sn(Xi/n) -Vn £ (Xi+1 /n - Xi/n)2,
n i=1 i=1
with Sn(Xi/n) = 0 and (Xi+1 /,n - Xi/n)2 = 0 for i > L(n - 1)rJ, the result then follows by
the continuous mapping theorem.
22
More intriguing information
1. Sex-gender-sexuality: how sex, gender, and sexuality constellations are constituted in secondary schools2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
5. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
6. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
7. The name is absent
8. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
9. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
10. The name is absent