Nonparametric cointegration analysis



J"Fk( x )Fm (x )dx "


Σ c1kc-1.

0


IV α..α

2*-~' j. k j

> 1


IV β-frβ .

2          .1,k' m,k


(A.46)


Finally.

χF(* ) dx - ∑

j                j0


2iπj


“ β t
V l,.k
2π ⅛ j


(A.47)


Q.E.D.

Proof of Lemma 7: Note that the set of solutions of eigenvalue problem (34) is a subset of the
set of solutions of eigenvalue problem

det


m

RqTrC(1)∑ xkxlτc(1) TRq

k= 1


Ï

O

O


Y1


Yl


(A.48)


m

RqTrC(1)∑ XkXkTC(1) TR.

= 0,


q-r


k= 1

because the matrix in (34) is singular only if the matrix in (A.48) is singular. Moreover. the non-
zero eigenvalues of (A.48) are just the solutions of the eigenvalue problem

det RqTrC(1)∑ XtXkTC(1) R


k= 1


q-r


(

m

- λ RqTrC(1)£ XkXkTC(1)TRι


k= 1


Y1


q-r

y


0 0.


(A.49)


Therefore. the non-zero solutions of eigenvalue problem (34) are bounded from below by the
minimum solution of eigenvalue problem (A.49). and so is
T1.m(H). Using the notation (18). it
is easy to verify that this minimum solution is the squared minimum solution of the eigenvalue
problem

46



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
3. Aktive Klienten - Aktive Politik? (Wie) Läßt sich dauerhafte Unabhängigkeit von Sozialhilfe erreichen? Ein Literaturbericht
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
7. The name is absent
8. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
9. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
10. The name is absent