Nonparametric cointegration analysis



J"Fk( x )Fm (x )dx "


Σ c1kc-1.

0


IV α..α

2*-~' j. k j

> 1


IV β-frβ .

2          .1,k' m,k


(A.46)


Finally.

χF(* ) dx - ∑

j                j0


2iπj


“ β t
V l,.k
2π ⅛ j


(A.47)


Q.E.D.

Proof of Lemma 7: Note that the set of solutions of eigenvalue problem (34) is a subset of the
set of solutions of eigenvalue problem

det


m

RqTrC(1)∑ xkxlτc(1) TRq

k= 1


Ï

O

O


Y1


Yl


(A.48)


m

RqTrC(1)∑ XkXkTC(1) TR.

= 0,


q-r


k= 1

because the matrix in (34) is singular only if the matrix in (A.48) is singular. Moreover. the non-
zero eigenvalues of (A.48) are just the solutions of the eigenvalue problem

det RqTrC(1)∑ XtXkTC(1) R


k= 1


q-r


(

m

- λ RqTrC(1)£ XkXkTC(1)TRι


k= 1


Y1


q-r

y


0 0.


(A.49)


Therefore. the non-zero solutions of eigenvalue problem (34) are bounded from below by the
minimum solution of eigenvalue problem (A.49). and so is
T1.m(H). Using the notation (18). it
is easy to verify that this minimum solution is the squared minimum solution of the eigenvalue
problem

46



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
3. The name is absent
4. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
5. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
6. The name is absent
7. Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks
8. The name is absent
9. Conditions for learning: partnerships for engaging secondary pupils with contemporary art.
10. The name is absent