Nonparametric cointegration analysis



J"Fk( x )Fm (x )dx "


Σ c1kc-1.

0


IV α..α

2*-~' j. k j

> 1


IV β-frβ .

2          .1,k' m,k


(A.46)


Finally.

χF(* ) dx - ∑

j                j0


2iπj


“ β t
V l,.k
2π ⅛ j


(A.47)


Q.E.D.

Proof of Lemma 7: Note that the set of solutions of eigenvalue problem (34) is a subset of the
set of solutions of eigenvalue problem

det


m

RqTrC(1)∑ xkxlτc(1) TRq

k= 1


Ï

O

O


Y1


Yl


(A.48)


m

RqTrC(1)∑ XkXkTC(1) TR.

= 0,


q-r


k= 1

because the matrix in (34) is singular only if the matrix in (A.48) is singular. Moreover. the non-
zero eigenvalues of (A.48) are just the solutions of the eigenvalue problem

det RqTrC(1)∑ XtXkTC(1) R


k= 1


q-r


(

m

- λ RqTrC(1)£ XkXkTC(1)TRι


k= 1


Y1


q-r

y


0 0.


(A.49)


Therefore. the non-zero solutions of eigenvalue problem (34) are bounded from below by the
minimum solution of eigenvalue problem (A.49). and so is
T1.m(H). Using the notation (18). it
is easy to verify that this minimum solution is the squared minimum solution of the eigenvalue
problem

46



More intriguing information

1. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
2. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
3. The name is absent
4. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
5. The name is absent
6. Needing to be ‘in the know’: strategies of subordination used by 10-11 year old school boys
7. The name is absent
8. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
9. The name is absent
10. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil