Nonparametric cointegration analysis



m

v*v* T
XkXk

k= 1


- λRTC(1)C(1) RJ"


= 0,


(A.50)


where the X*i’s are i.i.d. Nq-r(0,Iq-r), and the latter minimum solution is equal to, and bounded
from below by

inf


m

LM


η η tR C(1)C(1)TRqJ


m


inf__lm_______


η       η Tη


infη TRqTrC (1) C (1) TRrrη
η         η Tη


(A.51)


m

кk1


ï

T λ. RTC(1)C(1)TR, ).

mιn q r v 7 V 7    ,q-rf

7

This proves the inequality involved. Since

m +1

V


(A.52)

and Mα,s,q-r,m is decreasing in m, it follows now that the right-hand side lower bound involved
increases with
m. Q.E.D.

Proof of Lemma 8: For k > 0 we can write

n

(A.53)


2J2 t cos(2kπ (t-0.5)/n) = gn(2kπ /n) + gn(-2kπ /n),
where

47



More intriguing information

1. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
2. Midwest prospects and the new economy
3. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
4. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
5. The name is absent
6. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
7. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
8. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
9. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
10. The name is absent