The name is absent



We are now equipped to show the differentiability of the value function with the help of the
ʌ

theorem by [1]. Define l(Xc) as the optimal strategy if the threshold is Xc. Now define

W(X)  =  k [^^(Xo) + B [X0 - X]] -X2

'--------------------------v--------------------------'

î

+δ


Xc -cî ∞
∞  -∞


V (c(X, I) + v + u) fι(u)du g(v)dv + δ


∞∞

Xc -cî -∞


V (c(X, l) + r + v + u) f2 (u)du g(v)dv


'`z"


independent of X


Thus, all perturbations in X around X0 are immediately offset in the first period by an adjustment
in the loading equal to
B [X0 - X]. The advantage of W is that the payoff in future periods is
independent of X and only depends on X0, as by definition c(X, l) = BX + l + b = BX +
l(X0) + B[Xo - X] + b = BXo + l(Xo) + b.

Note that W (X) is defined on a neighborhood around X0. Clearly, W (X) is concave, dif-
ferentiable at
Xo, and W(X) V (X) as W(X) uses just one feasible strategy ll out of the set of
possible strategies whose maximum yields
V (X). Furthermore, by construction W(Xo) = V (Xo).
Using the above result that
V (X) is concave, as well as the theorem of [1], it follows that V (X) is
differentiable at
X0 as well and V'(X0) = W'(X0) = -Bk 2X0                           

Corollary: The critical level Xc influences the value function only as an additive constant α
Given that V'(X) = -Bk - 2X, we also know that the value function is given by V(X) =
α BkX X2                                                        I.

Proof of Proposition 3 The optimal combined loading is given by

k [1 - b - r [1 - Ф X~-—c) 1 - T~φ (~—c) [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + σ22 - σUιI
2 δ                          σv          2σv       σv                                2      1

Proof: Maximizing the right hand side of the Bellman equation by setting the derivative with
respect to
cl equal to zero we get

k δ -1 φ


( ——cλ f v(χc + u)fι(u)du + δ f c   f v'(δ + v + u)fι(u)dug(v)dv

σv

+δ -1 φ
σ
v


σv    -∞                  -∞   -∞

cc---) V V(Xc + r + u)f2(u)du + δ [ V V'(c + r + v + u)f2(u)dug(v)dv

σ σv — ∞ — ∞                       X--C -∞

k + δ -1 φ
σ
v


(Xσ-c i∣∕


V (Xc + r


-∞


+ u)f2 (u)du —     V (Xc + u)f1(u)du

-∞


+δ /       /   V'(c + v + u)fι(u)du g(v)dv + δ /      /   V'(c + r + v + u)f2(u)du g(v)dv

- -∞ - — ∞                            Jx c—c - -∞

29



More intriguing information

1. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
2. The name is absent
3. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
4. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
5. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
6. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
7. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
8. The name is absent
9. Picture recognition in animals and humans
10. The name is absent