After collecting terms
{ι+ɪ rφ
+ {-2⅛J '
f ∖ c∖ — 1φ /∖ c∖ [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + ∆σ2]1 l
σv 2σv σv
( —c---) [Bkr + 2cr + r2 + ∆σ2 ] +
[Xc —
συ
dc
φ' (—c) [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + ∆σ2] I
dσv
r + Xc 2 c [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 +
2σv2
dc
+ I-Λ φfXc-^ )
I 2σV ∖ σv J L
Bkr + 2cr + r2 + ∆σ2 —
[Xc —
σ2
σv
— [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + ∆σ,2] j>
dσv
The second line uses φ'(x) = -xφ(x). If Xc is as defined above, we know that φ (⅜-i) = Φ(1)-
Using this in the derivative we get
dc
—2 [Bkr + 2cr + r2 + ∆σ2 — Bkr — 2Xcr — r2 — ∆σ2 ]
2σv l u ut
dσv
1 I φ(1) I
1 + _ r +
σv
ɪ [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + ∆σ2 ]
2σv l u-∣
1 + φ(1) r + ɪ [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + ∆σ2]
σv 2,σv l c uj
—rφ(1)
σv + φ(1) r + ɪ [Bkr +
kσv [ J -B]+2σV-2rσv[1-Φ(1)]-φ(1)[Bkr+r2+∆σ2 ]
[rφ(1)+σv ]
r + r2 + ∆σ2 ]
The last term of the denominator becomes
1
r + ---[Bkr +
1
kσv [1 - Bl + 2σ2 - 2rσυ [1 - Φ(1)] - φ(1)[Bkr + r2 + ∆σ2 ] 2 2
------------------------------------------------------------r + r2 + ∆σ* ]
[rφ(1) + συ ]
2σv [rφ(1) + σv ]
1
2σv [rφ(1) + σv ]
^2συ r[rφ(1) + συ ] + Bkr [rφ(1) + συ ] + krσυ - - B j + 2rσ2 - 2r2 συ [1 - Φ(1)] - rφ(1)[Bkr + r2 + ∆σj ] + [r2 + ∆σj ] [rφ(1) + συ ]j
Bkrσv + krσv - b] + 4rσV + 2r2σ^[Φ(1) + φ(1) - 1] + σv [r2 + ∆σ^ ]] > 0
It is positive as 0 < δ,B < 1 implies that ∣ — B > 0 and Φ(1) + φ(1) — 1 > 0.
Proof of Proposition 9 An increase in the variance σ2χc can result in nonmonotonic behavior in
precautionary reductions, e.g., it can first decrease and then increase the optimal loading c.
The optimal loading when there is uncertainty about Xc was defined as
k rɪ
z∞
-∞
• (⅛c )l
+ —— φ (— cʌ) [Bkr + 2Xcr + r2 + ∆σ2] h(X,.)dX,. = 0
2σv ∖ συ Jl-
32
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. REVITALIZING FAMILY FARM AGRICULTURE
3. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
4. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
5. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia
6. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany
7. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
8. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
9. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time
10. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise