Table 10. Simulating the impact on preferences of changing RHS variables
A. Equation (4), Table 4
Simulated Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
— Pr(protect==l) I |
.0l4755 |
.00l4l67 |
.0l2l608 |
.0l77452 |
|
Pr(protect==2) I |
.0954396 |
.005584l |
.0846833 |
.l06l769 |
|
Pr(protect==3) I |
.l95409 |
.0062344 |
.l829937 |
.2076478 |
|
Pr(protect==4) I |
.38328l6 |
.0036822 |
.376044 |
.390276 |
|
Pr(protect==5) I |
.3llll48 |
.0l288l8 |
.286l02 |
.33629l2 |
First Difference: Change Patriotism from 40th to 60th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
t.0023l52 |
.0002286 |
t.0027948 |
t.00l922 |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.0090372 |
.0006l7l |
t.0l02836 |
t.0079466 |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.0093477 |
.00057l7 |
t.0l05066 |
t.0082473 |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
.0004353 |
.0007389 |
t.00l0632 |
.00l884 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.0202647 |
.00l2482 |
.0l78992 |
.022765l |
First Difference: Change Patriotism from 20th to 80th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
-.0ll7l89 |
.00ll6l6 |
t.0l4l546 t.0097234 | |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.045l26 |
.0030677 |
t.05l3l7 t.0397028 | |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.046383l |
.002800l |
t.0520588 t.0409887 | |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
.002l564 |
.0036593 |
t.00527l4 |
.0093273 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.l0l07l6 |
.006l935 |
.089328l |
.ll34693 |
First Difference: Change Chauvinism from 40th to 60th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
t.006l805 |
.0005l89 |
t.0072785 t.005l952 | |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.0248769 |
.00ll37 |
t.0270738 t.0226583 | |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.0266989 |
.0009393 |
t.028572l t.0249653 | |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
t.0004574 |
.0020837 |
t.0047l43 |
.0036249 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.0582l36 |
.0020582 |
.054l598 |
.06228l7 |
First Difference: Change Chauvinism from 20th to 80th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
t.0247046 |
.0020259 |
t.0289362 t.0207627 |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.0900888 |
.0039576 |
t.09773l t.0822445 |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.0894l3l |
.003l579 |
t.0956985 t.083667 |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
.0065264 |
.0070095 |
t.0078236 .0l99749 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.l97680l |
.0069093 |
.l840308 .2ll5l07 |
40
More intriguing information
1. El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-19962. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time
3. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
4. The name is absent
5. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
6. The name is absent
7. Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities
8. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent