Table 10. Simulating the impact on preferences of changing RHS variables
A. Equation (4), Table 4
Simulated Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
— Pr(protect==l) I |
.0l4755 |
.00l4l67 |
.0l2l608 |
.0l77452 |
|
Pr(protect==2) I |
.0954396 |
.005584l |
.0846833 |
.l06l769 |
|
Pr(protect==3) I |
.l95409 |
.0062344 |
.l829937 |
.2076478 |
|
Pr(protect==4) I |
.38328l6 |
.0036822 |
.376044 |
.390276 |
|
Pr(protect==5) I |
.3llll48 |
.0l288l8 |
.286l02 |
.33629l2 |
First Difference: Change Patriotism from 40th to 60th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
t.0023l52 |
.0002286 |
t.0027948 |
t.00l922 |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.0090372 |
.0006l7l |
t.0l02836 |
t.0079466 |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.0093477 |
.00057l7 |
t.0l05066 |
t.0082473 |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
.0004353 |
.0007389 |
t.00l0632 |
.00l884 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.0202647 |
.00l2482 |
.0l78992 |
.022765l |
First Difference: Change Patriotism from 20th to 80th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
-.0ll7l89 |
.00ll6l6 |
t.0l4l546 t.0097234 | |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.045l26 |
.0030677 |
t.05l3l7 t.0397028 | |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.046383l |
.002800l |
t.0520588 t.0409887 | |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
.002l564 |
.0036593 |
t.00527l4 |
.0093273 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.l0l07l6 |
.006l935 |
.089328l |
.ll34693 |
First Difference: Change Chauvinism from 40th to 60th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
t.006l805 |
.0005l89 |
t.0072785 t.005l952 | |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.0248769 |
.00ll37 |
t.0270738 t.0226583 | |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.0266989 |
.0009393 |
t.028572l t.0249653 | |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
t.0004574 |
.0020837 |
t.0047l43 |
.0036249 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.0582l36 |
.0020582 |
.054l598 |
.06228l7 |
First Difference: Change Chauvinism from 20th to 80th percentile
Change in Probability Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
dPr(protect==l) I |
t.0247046 |
.0020259 |
t.0289362 t.0207627 |
|
dPr(protect==2) I |
t.0900888 |
.0039576 |
t.09773l t.0822445 |
|
dPr(protect==3) I |
t.0894l3l |
.003l579 |
t.0956985 t.083667 |
|
dPr(protect==4) I |
.0065264 |
.0070095 |
t.0078236 .0l99749 |
|
dPr(protect==5) I |
.l97680l |
.0069093 |
.l840308 .2ll5l07 |
40
More intriguing information
1. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.2. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
3. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
4. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
5. Endogenous Determination of FDI Growth and Economic Growth:The OECD Case
6. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
7. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
8. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
9. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
10. The name is absent