Table 10. Simulating the impact on preferences of changing RHS variables
B. Equation (5), Table 4
Simulated Probability ∣ Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
— Pr(protect==l) ∣ |
.0l74649 |
.002789 .0l27l67 .023326l |
|
Pr(protect==2) ∣ |
.l26487l |
.0ll4484 .l065978 .l500246 |
|
Pr(protect==3) ∣ |
.2ll0957 |
.009337 .l925624 .2294772 |
|
Pr(protect==4) ∣ |
.3859744 |
.0055l72 .375l257 .3963836 |
|
Pr(protect==5) ∣ |
.2589779 |
.0l98ll2 .2l98795 .2959962 |
|
First Difference: Impact of being rural | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.0049403 |
.00l0727 -.007l378 -.0030334 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.0228495 |
.004l677 -.0308445 -.0l47l79 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.0l99502 |
.0036924 -.0268ll4 -.0l28275 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00330l6 |
.0028547 -.0020696 .009l907 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0444383 |
.0082096 .0288076 .0594362 |
|
First Difference: Impact of being unemployed | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.0023965 |
.0022055 -.006594l .0020396 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.0l09467 |
.0099035 -.0300374 .008259 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.0094249 |
.008589l -.02706l7 .00640l |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00l7947 |
.002442l -.00296 .0070637 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0209735 |
.0l9l444 -.0l42l54 .0600l5 |
|
First Difference: Impact of working in public sector | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.00l5352 |
.0009784 -.0034262 .0003988 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.0067ll5 |
.0042l86 -.0l46584 .00l6643 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.0054888 |
.0034838 -.0l2l543 .00l3485 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00l53l6 |
.00l2789 -.0004l3l .0044l34 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0l22039 |
.0077459 -.0029597 .0272057 |
|
First Difference: Impact of being self-employed | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
.003982 |
.00l5977 .00ll853 .007282l |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
.0l59954 |
.0059724 .00503l7 .0280853 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
.0ll8232 |
.0043245 .0040024 .0206445 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
-.0053709 |
.002822l -.0ll6064 -.00l0744 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
-.0264298 |
.0096l74 -.04626l5 -.0088937 |
|
First Difference: Impact of belonging to a trade union | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.00032ll |
.00020l3 -.00074l7 .0000625 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.00l3806 |
.00085 -.003074 .0002784 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.00ll037 |
.0006855 -.0024854 .000232 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00035l7 |
.0002788 -.0000952 .00l0l08 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0024536 |
.00l5l79 -.0005l32 .0055294 |
Source : see text.
43
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
3. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
4. Midwest prospects and the new economy
5. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
6. The name is absent
7. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
8. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
9. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
10. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom