Table 10. Simulating the impact on preferences of changing RHS variables
B. Equation (5), Table 4
Simulated Probability ∣ Mean Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval]
|
— Pr(protect==l) ∣ |
.0l74649 |
.002789 .0l27l67 .023326l |
|
Pr(protect==2) ∣ |
.l26487l |
.0ll4484 .l065978 .l500246 |
|
Pr(protect==3) ∣ |
.2ll0957 |
.009337 .l925624 .2294772 |
|
Pr(protect==4) ∣ |
.3859744 |
.0055l72 .375l257 .3963836 |
|
Pr(protect==5) ∣ |
.2589779 |
.0l98ll2 .2l98795 .2959962 |
|
First Difference: Impact of being rural | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.0049403 |
.00l0727 -.007l378 -.0030334 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.0228495 |
.004l677 -.0308445 -.0l47l79 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.0l99502 |
.0036924 -.0268ll4 -.0l28275 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00330l6 |
.0028547 -.0020696 .009l907 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0444383 |
.0082096 .0288076 .0594362 |
|
First Difference: Impact of being unemployed | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.0023965 |
.0022055 -.006594l .0020396 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.0l09467 |
.0099035 -.0300374 .008259 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.0094249 |
.008589l -.02706l7 .00640l |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00l7947 |
.002442l -.00296 .0070637 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0209735 |
.0l9l444 -.0l42l54 .0600l5 |
|
First Difference: Impact of working in public sector | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.00l5352 |
.0009784 -.0034262 .0003988 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.0067ll5 |
.0042l86 -.0l46584 .00l6643 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.0054888 |
.0034838 -.0l2l543 .00l3485 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00l53l6 |
.00l2789 -.0004l3l .0044l34 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0l22039 |
.0077459 -.0029597 .0272057 |
|
First Difference: Impact of being self-employed | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
.003982 |
.00l5977 .00ll853 .007282l |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
.0l59954 |
.0059724 .00503l7 .0280853 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
.0ll8232 |
.0043245 .0040024 .0206445 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
-.0053709 |
.002822l -.0ll6064 -.00l0744 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
-.0264298 |
.0096l74 -.04626l5 -.0088937 |
|
First Difference: Impact of belonging to a trade union | ||
|
Change in Probability ∣ Mean |
Std. Dev. [95% Conf. Interval] | |
|
dPr(protect==l) ∣ |
-.00032ll |
.00020l3 -.00074l7 .0000625 |
|
dPr(protect==2) ∣ |
-.00l3806 |
.00085 -.003074 .0002784 |
|
dPr(protect==3) ∣ |
-.00ll037 |
.0006855 -.0024854 .000232 |
|
dPr(protect==4) ∣ |
.00035l7 |
.0002788 -.0000952 .00l0l08 |
|
dPr(protect==5) ∣ |
.0024536 |
.00l5l79 -.0005l32 .0055294 |
Source : see text.
43
More intriguing information
1. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems2. Auction Design without Commitment
3. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
7. The name is absent
8. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
9. The name is absent
10. Implementation of Rule Based Algorithm for Sandhi-Vicheda Of Compound Hindi Words