Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test



Two points may be worth mentioning here. First, Assumption 4(i) dictates
that the regressors in
x3,it are mixing conditional on Fzi . Alternately, we may
assume that
x3,it and zi have some common factors, say fi (i =1, ..., N), on
which, conditionally, the variables in
x3,it are mixing. This alternative assump-
tion does not generate any materially different asymptotic result. Second, as
discussed in Section 3, Assumption 5(ii) warrants that the conditional
α-mixing
coefficient
αzi (d) is measurable.

Panel data estimators of individual coefficients have different convergence
rates depending on the types of the corresponding regressors. To address these
differences, we define:

Dx,T = diag (D1T,D2T,D3T);

DT = diag (Dx,T,Ig) ,

where

D1T = diag T-m1,...,T-mk1 ;

D2T = diag (D21τ,D22τ) = diag(l^ ,VTlk22') ;

D3T = diag (D31T, D32T, D33T)

= diag (TIk31, Tlk32 ,Tm133 ,...,Tm    ´ .

Observe that D1T, D2T, and D3T are conformable to regressor vectors x1,it,
x
2,it, and x3,it , respectively, while DT and ]g are to xit and zi , respectively.
The diagonal matrix Dt is chosen so that plimN→∞ -N Pi DtWiWi0Dt is well
defined and finite. For future use, we also define

Gx,T = diag(D1T,]k21,]k22,]k3);

Jx,T = diag(]k1,]k21,D22T,D3T),

so that

Dx,T = Gx,T Jx,T.

Using this notation, we make the following regularity assumptions on the un-
conditional and conditional means of regressors:

Assumption 6 (convergence as T →∞): Defining t =[Tr], we assume that
the following restrictions hold as
T →∞.

(i) Let τ1 (r) = diag (rm1,1 , ..., rmk1,1 ) ,where mh,1 is defined in Assumption

2. Then,

D1TE (x1,it) τ1 (r) Θ1,i

uniformly in i and r [0, 1], for some Θ1,i = (Θ1,1,i, ..., Θk1,1,i)0 with
supi kΘ1,i k < ∞.

(ii) Θ21,it Θ21,i and Θ3,it Θ3,i uniformly in i with supi kΘ21,i k < ∞ and
supi kΘ3,i k < ∞.

21



More intriguing information

1. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
2. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
3. La mobilité de la main-d'œuvre en Europe : le rôle des caractéristiques individuelles et de l'hétérogénéité entre pays
4. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
5. The name is absent
6. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
12. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
13. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
14. The name is absent
15. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
16. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
17. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
18. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
19. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
20. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015