Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test



where Γjl,i (t, s)=E xj,it - EFzi xj,it xl,is - EFzi xl,is , for j, l =2,3. Essen-
tially, the Γ
i is the unconditional mean of the conditional variance-covariance
matrix of (x
02,it , x03,it)0. We also define the unconditional variance-covariance
matrix of (x
01,it,x02,it,x03,it)0 by

Γi (t, s) = [Γjl,i (t, s)]jl,

where Γji,i (t,s) = E (xj,it - Exj,it) (xι,is - Exι,is) , for j,l = 1, 2, 3. Observe
that Γ
22,i (t,s) = Γ22,i (t,s), since x2,it and zi are independent. With this
notation, we make the following assumption on the convergence of variances
and covariances:

Assumption 8 (convergence of covariances): As (N, T →∞),

∕i∙) ɪ P ɪ PP μ r22,i (t>s) r23,i (t, s)   .i γ22 Г23 A

(i)    ...    Γ23,i (t,s) Γ33,i (t,s) ) V ГΓ33 )■

(a) N PiT Pt Γi (t,t) → φ.

Note that the variance matrix [Γjl]j,l=2,3 is the cross section average of the long-
run variance-covariance matrix of
(x^ it,x'3 itt)1'■ For future use, we partition the
two limits in the assumption conformably to (x
021,it,x022,it,x031,it,x032,it,x033,it)0 as
follows:

Γ22

Γ'23


Γ23

Γ33   =

/ r21,21

Γ21,22

Γ21,31

Γ21,32

Γ21,33

γ21,22

Γ22,22

Γ22,31

Γ22,32

Γ22,33

Γ'
Γ21,31

Γ'
Γ22,31

Γ31,31

Γ31,32

Γ31,33

γ21,32

Γ'
Γ22,32

Γ'
Γ31,32

Γ32,32

Γ32,33

Γ'21,33

Γ'
Γ22,33

Γ'
Γ31,33

Γ'
Γ32,33

Γ33,33

/

Φ11 Φ12  Φ13

Φ =   Φ'12  Φ22  Φ23

Φ'13  Φ'23  Φ33


Finally, we make a formal definition of the random effects assumption, which
is a more rigorous version of (3).

Assumption 9 (random effects): Conditional on Fw, {ui}i=1,...,N is i.i.d. with
mean zero, variance
σ2u and finite κu kui kF ,4 .

To investigate the power property of the Hausman test, we also need to
define an alternative hypothesis which states a particular direction of model
misspecification. Among many alternatives, we here consider a simpler one.
Specifically, we consider an alternative hypothesis under which the conditional
mean of u
i is a linear function of DT wei . Abusing the conventional definition
of fixed effects (that indicates nonzero-correlations between w
i =(x'it,zi')' and
u
i ), we refer to this alternative as the fixed effects assumption:

Assumption 10 (fixed effects): Conditional on Fw, the {ui}i=1,...,N is i.i.d.
with mean
wei' DT λ and variance σ2u, where λ is a (k +g) × 1 nonrandom nonzero
vector.

24



More intriguing information

1. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
2. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
6. The name is absent
7. Conflict and Uncertainty: A Dynamic Approach
8. The name is absent
9. Moffett and rhetoric
10. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
11. The name is absent
12. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
13. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
14. The name is absent
15. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
16. A multistate demographic model for firms in the province of Gelderland
17. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
18. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
19. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
20. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica