Let Xh,2,it be the hth element of Xh,2,it. The required result follows if we can
show that
sup
i,T
√T X (xh,2,it
T t
- Exh,2,it)
< M for all h.
4
(41)
The proof of (41) is similar to the proof of Lemma 1 of Andrews (1991). This
proof relies on the following α- mixing inequality presented in Hall and Heyde
(1980, p. 278). Suppose that Y and W are random variables that are G-
measurable and H- measurable, respectively, with E ∣Y ∣p < ∞ and E ∣W∣q <
∞, where p,q > 1 with 1/p + 1/q < 1. Then,
∣E (Y - EY ) (W - EW ) ∣ ≤ 8 H Y ∣∣p ∣∣ W ∣∣g [α (G, H)]1-1/p-1/q , (42)
where α (G, H) is the α-mixing coefficient between the sigma fields G and H.
Now, let Xit = xh,2,it - Exh,2,it. Notice that
4
p e .. Σ X«)
sup T χ x x x∣e (Xi,XisXipXik )∣
i,τ t=1 s = 1 p=1 k= 1
T -tT-sT -p
⅛ 5⅛2χχχΣ∣E (XitXi,t+sXi,t+s+pXi,t+s+p+k) ∣
i,T t s=0 p=0 k=0
4!siuτp T X
Σ
0≤p,k≤s
0≤p+k+s≤T-t
∣ E (Xit (Xi,t+sXi,t+s+pXi,t+s+p+k)) ∣
+4!sup ɪ X X
i,T t 0≤s,k≤p
0≤p+k+s≤T-t
+4!sup .=2 X X
i,i t 0≤s,k≤p
0≤p+k+s≤T-t
1
+4!siup .χ
x
0≤s,p≤k
0≤p+k+s≤T-t
= I + II + III + IV, say.
E [(Xit
Xi,t+s) (Xi,t+s+pXi,t+s+p+k)]
-E (XitXi,t+s) E (Xi,t+s+pXi,t+s+p+k )
∣ E (XitXi,t+s) E (Xi,t+s+pXi,t+s+p+k) ∣
E ((Xit
Xi,t+sXi,t+s+p') Xi,t+s+p+k) ∣
By applying the inequality of (42) to Xi,t+sXi,t+s+pXi,t+s+p+k and Xit and
then by the Holder inequality, we have
1T
i ≤ 4!8sup .2 HXitk4q HXi,t+sH4q Il Xi,t+s+p ∣∣ 4q
i,T t=10≤p,k≤s≤T-t
×∣∣Xi,t+s+p+k∣∣4q αi (s)q-1
35
More intriguing information
1. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.2. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
3. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
4. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Draft of paper published in:
8. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
9. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
10. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered