4 ∖4 1 T-1 s s Q-1
4!8 f sup ∣∣Xit∣∣4qj sup T∑∑∑α,(s) q
, i,T s=1 p=0 k=0
4∞ 1
sup ∣Xit ∣4q X(s +1)2 sup ai (s) q < M,
(43)
i,t s=1 i
where the last bound holds because supi ai (s) is of size —3 ^-ɪ (see Assumption
3(i)). By the similar fashion, we can also show that
II,III,IV ≤ 4!8
4∞
sup∣Xit∣4q (
i,t s=1
s +1)2 sup αi (s) q <M,
i
and we have all the required result. ¥
Part (c)
Let Yit = xh,3,it — EFz xh,3,it. Using the arguments similar to those used in
the proof of Part (b), we can show that under Assumption 4,

2M (sup kYitkFzi,4q) X s2 (sup aFzi (s) qq )
a.s.,
(44)
for some constant M. By Assumption 4(i), P∞= s2 supi aFZ (s) q < ∞ a.s..
Finally, since the terms supi t kYitkF 4q and PS=1 s2 supi αFz. (s) q are F∞o-
measurable, we have the desired result by choosing
Mz =2M
sup kYitk4Fzi,4q Xs2 sup aFzi
q— 1 ∖
(s) ~ J . ¥
Part (d)
Again, let Yit = xh,3,it — EFzi xh,3,it. From (44) , we have
sup
i,T
Yit
sup E
i,T
Yit
≤ 2ME
(sup kYit ∣Fzi ,4q) X s2 (sup aFzi (s) q—q~ ɔ
≤ 2M E
sup kYitk8Fzi,4q
)]2 E{ x s2('
36
q — 1
sup αFzi (s) q
(45)
More intriguing information
1. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster2. Parent child interaction in Nigerian families: conversation analysis, context and culture
3. The name is absent
4. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
5. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
6. The name is absent
7. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
8. Job quality and labour market performance
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent