4 ∖4 1 T-1 s s Q-1
4!8 f sup ∣∣Xit∣∣4qj sup T∑∑∑α,(s) q
, i,T s=1 p=0 k=0
4∞ 1
sup ∣Xit ∣4q X(s +1)2 sup ai (s) q < M,
(43)
i,t s=1 i
where the last bound holds because supi ai (s) is of size —3 ^-ɪ (see Assumption
3(i)). By the similar fashion, we can also show that
II,III,IV ≤ 4!8
4∞
sup∣Xit∣4q (
i,t s=1
s +1)2 sup αi (s) q <M,
i
and we have all the required result. ¥
Part (c)
Let Yit = xh,3,it — EFz xh,3,it. Using the arguments similar to those used in
the proof of Part (b), we can show that under Assumption 4,

2M (sup kYitkFzi,4q) X s2 (sup aFzi (s) qq )
a.s.,
(44)
for some constant M. By Assumption 4(i), P∞= s2 supi aFZ (s) q < ∞ a.s..
Finally, since the terms supi t kYitkF 4q and PS=1 s2 supi αFz. (s) q are F∞o-
measurable, we have the desired result by choosing
Mz =2M
sup kYitk4Fzi,4q Xs2 sup aFzi
q— 1 ∖
(s) ~ J . ¥
Part (d)
Again, let Yit = xh,3,it — EFzi xh,3,it. From (44) , we have
sup
i,T
Yit
sup E
i,T
Yit
≤ 2ME
(sup kYit ∣Fzi ,4q) X s2 (sup aFzi (s) q—q~ ɔ
≤ 2M E
sup kYitk8Fzi,4q
)]2 E{ x s2('
36
q — 1
sup αFzi (s) q
(45)
More intriguing information
1. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles2. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
3. The name is absent
4. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
5. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
6. The name is absent
7. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
8. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
9. The Shepherd Sinfonia
10. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY