Here, the last line holds because under the local alternative hypotheses,
Jx-,T1Dx,TF1Dx,TJx-,T1 =Op(1),
by (102), and
θ Gi
σv
(√NTGχ,τA2) = Op (θτ) = op (1),
by Lemma 2(a), (b) and Assumption 12.
Finally, by Lemma 2(c), as (N,T →∞) ,
Dx,TF1Dx,T
Dx,TA3Dx,T - Dx,TCB3-1C0Dx,T
N X Dx,TXiX0D
i
(n X Dχ,Tzi2°) (n X ziz0)
-1
(⅛ X Dx,Txiz0
Ξ - Ξ Ξ-1Ξ > 0
p xx - xz zz zx > .
Also, Lemmas 2(d) and 3 imply that under the local alternative hypotheses, as
(N,T →∞),
√NDχ.τ F2
√NDχ,τ A4 + √NDχ,τ A5
1N
√N^Dχ,τ xiui
i=1
dx,t св-1 Vn (b4 + B5)
(N XX
i=1
Dχ,τ xiz^ (n X
0
ZiZ0
1 1N
( √N∑2ziui I + oP (1)
⇒ Ik
Ξ Ξ-1
-Ξxz Ξzz
N Ξλ, σ2u Ξ .
As (N,T →∞) ,
fects,
θT √T →
σv
ɪ. Therefore, under the hypothesis of random ef-
σu
HMNT ⇒ χ2k ,
a χ2 distribution with the degrees of freedom equal to k. In contrast, under the
local alternative hypotheses,
HMNT ⇒ χ2k (η) ,
where η is the noncentral parameter.
63
More intriguing information
1. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
6. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
10. The name is absent