NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



Figure 7.13: Total number of correct responses in the “categorisation questions”
by children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items across testing.....   230

Figure 7.14: Total number of correct responses in the “world knowledge
questions” by children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items across
testing.................................................................................................. 231

Figure 7.15: Total number of correct responses in the “categorisation questions”
by semantic domain across testing...................................................... 231

Figure 7.16: Total number of correct responses in the “world knowledge
questions” by semantic domain across testing................................... 232

Figure 7.17: Total number of appropriate justifications provided in the
association task by group across testing............................................. 238

Figure 7.18: Types Ofjustifications provided in the Association task across
testing................................................................................................. 240

Figure 7.19: Provision of perceptual justifications by group across testing...........   241

Figure 7.20: Provision of Perceptualjustifications by children’s prior knowledge
of lexical items across testing.............................................................. 242

Figure 7.21: Provision of Perceptualjustifications by semantic domain across
testing................................................................................................. 242

Figure 7.22: Provision of Semanticjustifications in the association task by group
across testing...................................................................................... 243

Figure 7.23: Provision of Semanticjustifications by children’s prior knowledge
of the lexical items across testing........................................................ 244

Figure 7.24: Provision of Semanticjustifications by semantic domain of the
lexical items across testing................................................................. 245

Figure 7.25: Provision of thematic justifications by group across
testing.................................................................................................. 246

Figure 7.26: Provision of thematic justifications by children’s prior knowledge
of the lexical items across testing........................................................ 246

Figure 7.27: Provision of thematic justifications by semantic domain of the
lexical items across testing................................................................. 247

Figure 7.28: Total number of correct responses in the contrast task by group
across testing...................................................................................... 252

14



More intriguing information

1. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
2. Happiness in Eastern Europe
3. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
4. The name is absent
5. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
6. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
7. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
8. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
9. Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?
10. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
11. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
12. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
13. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
14. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots
15. The name is absent
16. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
17. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
18. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
19. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
20. The name is absent