193
While specific schemes are not identified, Ngenda (1993) mentions that marital status was used
in some schemes as a criteria for participation. In those cases, married women could not be considered
as individuals to own farms or plots. Single women without children were also not eligible for these
schemes unless they were backed by a male figure or had a position in the ruling political party
structure at the local level. The available data are not gender specific except in two cases shown in
tables 6.9 and 6.10.
Table 6.9: Number of settlers in Rural Reconstruction Centers,
December 1979
|
Province |
Male |
Female |
Total settlers (#) |
|
Central |
395 |
1 |
396 |
|
Copperbelt |
589 |
5 |
594 |
|
Eastern |
303 |
1 |
304 |
|
Luapula |
285 |
1 |
286 |
|
Lusaka |
189 |
- |
189 |
|
Northern |
494 |
1 |
495 |
|
North-Western |
295 |
5 |
300 |
|
Southern |
454 |
6 |
460 |
|
Western |
348 |
4 |
352 |
|
National totals |
3,352 |
24 |
3,376 |
Source: Chambo Kawonga, Technical Paper No. 10, Rural Reconstruction Programme
ILO/JASPA (1981), p. 148.
Table 6.10: Farm owners by sex in various settlement schemes
|
Settlement scheme |
Male |
Female |
Joint |
Total |
|
Chitina |
45 |
4 |
49 | |
|
Big Concession |
68 |
2 |
70 | |
|
Lubombo |
63 |
2 |
65 | |
|
Lukulu North |
74 |
- |
74 | |
|
Lusaka |
101 |
9 |
5 |
115 |
|
Milombwe |
117 |
1 |
- |
118 |
|
Mumba |
53 |
5 |
- |
58 |
|
Mungwi |
144 |
6 |
150 | |
|
Ngwezi |
128 |
2 |
130 | |
|
Totals |
793 |
31 |
5 |
829 |
Source: C.N. Himoonga, M. Munachonga, and A. Chanda, "Women's Access to Agricultural
Land in Zambia" (1988).
More intriguing information
1. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry2. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
3. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
4. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
8. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
9. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
10. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland