Table 6: Description of explanatory variables
Variable |
All |
Males |
Females | |||
Mean |
St. Dev. |
Mean |
St. Dev. |
Mean |
St. Dev. | |
father never drinker |
0.186 |
0.389 |
0.180 |
0.384 |
0.193 |
0.395 |
father monthly drinker |
0.236 |
0.424 |
0.236 |
0.425 |
0.235 |
0.424 |
father weekly drinker |
0.259 |
0.438 |
0.268 |
0.443 |
0.250 |
0.433 |
father daily drinker |
0.319 |
0.466 |
0.316 |
0.465 |
0.323 |
0.468 |
mother never drinker |
0.507 |
0.500 |
0.499 |
0.500 |
0.514 |
0.500 |
mother monthly drinker |
0.285 |
0.452 |
0.292 |
0.455 |
0.280 |
0.449 |
mother weekly drinker |
0.136 |
0.342 |
0.141 |
0.348 |
0.130 |
0.336 |
mother daily drinker |
0.072 |
0.259 |
0.068 |
0.251 |
0.076 |
0.266 |
father never-smoker |
0.276 |
0.447 |
0.275 |
0.447 |
0.276 |
0.447 |
father ex-smoker |
0.351 |
0.477 |
0.357 |
0.479 |
0.345 |
0.475 |
father smoker |
0.373 |
0.484 |
0.368 |
0.482 |
0.379 |
0.485 |
mother never-smoker |
0.674 |
0.469 |
0.676 |
0.468 |
0.673 |
0.469 |
mother ex-smoker |
0.126 |
0.331 |
0.128 |
0.334 |
0.124 |
0.330 |
mother smoker |
0.200 |
0.400 |
0.197 |
0.397 |
0.203 |
0.402 |
year 1980 |
0.187 |
0.390 |
0.193 |
0.395 |
0.180 |
0.384 |
year 1986 |
0.128 |
0.334 |
0.133 |
0.340 |
0.123 |
0.328 |
year 1990 |
0.581 |
0.493 |
0.573 |
0.495 |
0.590 |
0.492 |
year 1992 |
0.104 |
0.305 |
0.101 |
0.302 |
0.107 |
0.309 |
west |
0.838 |
0.368 |
0.844 |
0.362 |
0.832 |
0.374 |
female |
0.503 |
0.500 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
age |
24.318 |
6.297 |
24.213 |
6.275 |
24.421 |
6.317 |
age2/100 |
6.310 |
3.351 |
6.256 |
0.064 |
6.363 |
3.366 |
parents married |
0.807 |
0.395 |
0.811 |
0.392 |
0.805 |
0.396 |
father has no school degree |
0.139 |
0.346 |
0.138 |
0.344 |
0.140 |
0.347 |
father has a low degree |
0.531 |
0.499 |
0.533 |
0.499 |
0.529 |
0.499 |
father has a medium degree |
0.156 |
0.363 |
0.159 |
0.366 |
0.151 |
0.358 |
father has a high degree |
0.032 |
0.175 |
0.032 |
0.176 |
0.032 |
0.176 |
father has a university degree |
0.142 |
0.349 |
0.138 |
0.345 |
0.148 |
0.355 |
mother has no school degree |
0.309 |
0.462 |
0.304 |
0.460 |
0.315 |
0.464 |
mother has a low degree |
0.416 |
0.493 |
0.424 |
0.494 |
0.408 |
0.491 |
mother has a medium degree |
0.191 |
0.393 |
0.189 |
0.391 |
0.193 |
0.395 |
mother has a high degree |
0.024 |
0.154 |
0.025 |
0.157 |
0.023 |
0.150 |
mother has a university degree |
0.059 |
0.236 |
0.058 |
0.234 |
0.061 |
0.240 |
grown up with mother |
0.953 |
0.212 |
0.954 |
0.211 |
0.952 |
0.214 |
grown up with father |
0.891 |
0.312 |
0.891 |
0.312 |
0.890 |
0.312 |
grown up with both |
0.881 |
0.324 |
0.881 |
0.324 |
0.882 |
0.323 |
no. children at parents home |
2.752 |
1.462 |
2.732 |
1.434 |
2.772 |
1.488 |
Notes: Descriptive statistics for those 26516 observations that are included in at least one of
the reduced form regressions; statistics are proposed for all variables prior to interacting with
dummies indicating having grown up with the parent; reference-categories italicized.
29
More intriguing information
1. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards2. Evolving robust and specialized car racing skills
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
7. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
8. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
9. The name is absent
10. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution