Table 8: Structural model — spec. including potentially endogenous variables
Drinking Smoking
Parameter |
Ex. Variable |
Coefficient |
St. Error |
Coefficient |
St. Error |
γa |
fitted smoking |
0.100** |
0.029 |
- |
- |
γc |
fitted drinking |
- |
- |
-0.155** |
0.050 |
father monthly drinker |
1.854** |
0.342 |
- |
- | |
father weekly drinker |
3.417** |
0.342 |
- |
- | |
X |
father daily drinker |
4.244** |
0.348 |
- |
- |
δa |
mother monthly drinker |
3.001** |
0.260 |
- |
- |
mother weekly drinker |
4.540** |
0.404 |
- |
- | |
mother daily drinker |
4.418** |
0.509 |
- |
- | |
father ex-smoker |
- |
- |
3.645** |
0.433 | |
X |
father smoker |
- |
- |
6.501** |
0.414 |
δc |
mother ex-smoker |
- |
- |
3.408** |
0.482 |
mother smoker |
- |
- |
6.863** |
0.355 | |
constant |
8.983** |
2.797 |
-20.285** |
3.891 | |
year 1986 |
-2.010** |
0.473 |
-3.252** |
0.505 | |
year 1990 |
-2.199** |
0.407 |
-4.569** |
0.485 | |
year 1992 |
-6.791** |
0.810 |
-7.480** |
0.990 | |
west |
-7.834** |
0.667 |
-1.631 |
0.900 | |
female |
-10.451** |
0.287 |
-5.397** |
0.690 | |
age |
0.917** |
0.204 |
2.776** |
0.270 | |
age2/100 |
-0.817* |
0.367 |
-4.529** |
0.467 | |
parents married |
0.036 |
0.413 |
-1.507** |
0.425 | |
parents not married but together |
-2.098 |
2.333 |
-0.979 |
2.119 | |
β |
father has low degree |
0.822* |
0.343 |
0.113 |
0.499 |
father has medium degree |
0.591 |
0.434 |
0.848 |
0.570 | |
father has high degree |
-0.125 |
0.733 |
0.680 |
0.944 | |
father has uni degree |
1.372** |
0.514 |
0.814 |
0.735 | |
mother has low degree |
-0.114 |
0.315 |
-0.129 |
0.368 | |
mother has medium degree |
-0.066 |
0.391 |
0.766 |
0.539 | |
mother has high degree |
-0.582 |
0.740 |
-1.003 |
1.136 | |
mother has uni degree |
-0.279 |
0.531 |
-0.447 |
0.811 | |
grown up with mother |
-1.698 |
0.920 |
-4.355** |
0.830 | |
grown up with father |
-4.192** |
1.433 |
-6.980** |
1.698 | |
grown up with both |
1.468 |
1.507 |
0.825 |
1.665 | |
no. children at parents home |
0.039 |
0.083 |
0.540** |
0.091 | |
married |
-1.262** |
0.411 |
-2.705** |
0.504 | |
separated / divorced |
-0.441 |
0.852 |
3.922** |
0.742 | |
widowed |
-2.189 |
2.541 |
-0.822 |
3.271 | |
number own children |
-0.270 |
0.241 |
0.610* |
0.267 | |
low school degree |
-2.143* |
1.020 |
-2.845** |
0.627 | |
medium school degree |
-1.402 |
1.013 |
-6.199** |
0.634 | |
high school degree |
-1.040 |
1.088 |
-10.738** |
0.763 | |
unemployed |
2.078* |
0.866 |
5.984** |
0.763 | |
part time job |
-0.013 |
0.614 |
2.384** |
0.728 | |
β |
full time job |
1.743** |
0.478 |
3.948** |
0.605 |
military or civil service |
2.143* |
0.968 |
2.821* |
1.401 | |
less than a part time job |
0.953 |
1.395 |
3.886** |
1.064 | |
pupil |
-4.676** |
1.150 |
-9.174** |
0.848 | |
student |
0.511 |
0.699 |
0.299 |
0.869 | |
in vocational training |
-0.133 |
0.603 |
2.934** |
0.615 | |
in other kind of training |
0.416 |
0.835 |
2.346* |
0.934 | |
number of persons per household |
0.062 |
0.123 |
-0.907** |
0.163 | |
household income 1000 - 1499 DM |
-0.162 |
0.759 |
0.339 |
0.780 | |
household income 1500 - 1999 DM |
-1.030 |
0.691 |
0.186 |
0.861 | |
household income 2000 - 2499 DM |
-0.598 |
0.674 |
-0.266 |
0.812 | |
household income 2500 - 2999 DM |
-0.779 |
0.624 |
-0.296 |
0.860 | |
household income 3000 - 3999 DM |
-1.026 |
0.632 |
-0.568 |
0.844 | |
household income 4000 DM and more |
-0.108 |
0.672 |
0.390 |
0.870 | |
number of obs. |
23195 |
23746 | |||
ovi-test |
_____________0.472 |
0.038 |
Notes: ** significant at the the 1% level; * significant at the the 5% level; bootstrapped
st. errors (100 repetitions); “ovi-test” indicates p-values for testing over-identifying restrictions.
31
More intriguing information
1. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)2. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
3. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
8. The name is absent
9. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
10. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions