82
Table 6.8: Rate of Reelection of Mayors in the 50%z 75% and 90%
Intervals -1983-2007
.. л Upper 50,,o Upper 75% Upper 90% | |||
3332 |
1825 |
726 | |
63.92 |
65.69 |
69.47 | |
,*'v∙'∙∙.-r< ' |
1881 |
953 |
319 |
36.08 |
34.31 |
30.53 | |
:• '√∙∙'iζ. |
5213 |
2778 |
ÎÔ45 |
100 |
100 ~ |
100 |
Table 6.9: Percentage of Legislators Immediately running for Mayoral
Positions -1983-2007
MayoralCandidate N Percent
0 |
1,408 |
93.8 |
1 ^~~ |
' 93 |
6.2 |
Total |
lz501 |
100 |
Hypotheses
The goal of the present piece exceeds the (undoubtedly) interesting question
about when would a legislator seek subnational positions. It is clear that the likelihood
increases when the opportunities are perceived as favorable. However, I am interested
in unfolding legislators' behavior when they decide to run for a subnational position. To
do so, I will try to disentangle whether bill drafting foresees immediate subnational
executive ambition.
Through the utilization of the database already described, I will use the
immediate pursuit of a gubernatorial or a mayoral position as dependent variables of
my estimations. The principal covariate will be whether each legislator is πmning for a
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
3. New issues in Indian macro policy.
4. The name is absent
5. Clinical Teaching and OSCE in Pediatrics
6. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
7. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
8. Healthy state, worried workers: North Carolina in the world economy
9. The name is absent
10. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart