∞. In this complete bonding limit, Xл and Xβ would vanish throughout the system.
Also, X л = Xв (= X) for all the segments of chain T since each site on the segments
reaches its complete bonding limit at the same rate. This leads to the simplification
• 2 I-Xi
m = ——, (2.ιi)
and the excess free energy due to formation of the bonds is
д chain ι mi
⅛='2∑Σi<Σ (⅛ + ∣n⅛)-l), (2.12)
i α=l A∈Γ(a)
where the constant term containing the energy of association and the bonding volume
has been dropped. The second and third sum over all the segments of chain T and
their bonding sites yield 2(гщ - 1). Therefore,
д chain __ __
= - ∑Xi(mi - 1) (In A - 1) - ∑xi(mi - 1) (ln⅛(⅛)) . (2.13)
i i
The first term in this equation accounts for the decrease in the ideal free energy or the
loss in the translation degrees of freedom due to decrease in the number of molecules
(from Ns spheres to N chains), while the second term accounts for the decrease in
the excluded volume as the chains are formed. Substituting eqs. 2.3, 2.6, and 2.13 in
41
More intriguing information
1. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows2. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
3. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
4. Behavior-Based Early Language Development on a Humanoid Robot
5. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
6. The name is absent
7. On the Real Exchange Rate Effects of Higher Electricity Prices in South Africa
8. The name is absent
9. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
10. Voluntary Teaming and Effort