Table 4.1: Transition propagation rate for different gates. The rising and the falling
transitions do not enforce the same delay rates.
Gate |
Rising (pS∕μm) |
Falling (pS∕μm) |
Inverter |
86.9 |
40.77 |
NAND2 |
176.9 |
507.7 |
N0R2 |
95.4 |
1106.2 |
the gates deviate from their nominal values, i.e. [49],
dr(gi) = daomm⅛) + ξrtgilgi, (4.4)
where (grɪ ) is the nominal delay for rising transition and lgi is the varia-
tion for the gate gi and ξrι3i is a constant coefficient. Table 4.1 shows the constant
coefficients for NAND2 gate. Similarly for the falling transition,
dʃ(^) = dy0mmal(<7j) + ξf,gilgi. (4.5)
Thus, Equation 4.3 becomes
43
More intriguing information
1. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care2. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
3. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
4. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
5. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
9. Yield curve analysis
10. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica