The name is absent



Table 4.1: Transition propagation rate for different gates. The rising and the falling

transitions do not enforce the same delay rates.

Gate

Rising (pS∕μm)

Falling (pS∕μm)

Inverter

86.9

40.77

NAND2

176.9

507.7

N0R2

95.4

1106.2

the gates deviate from their nominal values, i.e. [49],

dr(gi) = daomm⅛) + ξrtgilgi,                  (4.4)

where          (grɪ ) is the nominal delay for rising transition and lgi is the varia-

tion for the gate gi and ξrι3i is a constant coefficient. Table 4.1 shows the constant
coefficients for NAND2 gate. Similarly for the falling transition,

dʃ(^) = dy0mmal(<7j) + ξf,gilgi.                     (4.5)

Thus, Equation 4.3 becomes

43



More intriguing information

1. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
2. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
3. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
4. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
5. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
6. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
7. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
8. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
9. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
10. Biologically inspired distributed machine cognition: a new formal approach to hyperparallel computation