Table 4.1: Transition propagation rate for different gates. The rising and the falling
transitions do not enforce the same delay rates.
Gate |
Rising (pS∕μm) |
Falling (pS∕μm) |
Inverter |
86.9 |
40.77 |
NAND2 |
176.9 |
507.7 |
N0R2 |
95.4 |
1106.2 |
the gates deviate from their nominal values, i.e. [49],
dr(gi) = daomm⅛) + ξrtgilgi, (4.4)
where (grɪ ) is the nominal delay for rising transition and lgi is the varia-
tion for the gate gi and ξrι3i is a constant coefficient. Table 4.1 shows the constant
coefficients for NAND2 gate. Similarly for the falling transition,
dʃ(^) = dy0mmal(<7j) + ξf,gilgi. (4.5)
Thus, Equation 4.3 becomes
43
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
3. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
4. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
5. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany
6. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
10. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?