Table 4.1: Transition propagation rate for different gates. The rising and the falling
transitions do not enforce the same delay rates.
Gate |
Rising (pS∕μm) |
Falling (pS∕μm) |
Inverter |
86.9 |
40.77 |
NAND2 |
176.9 |
507.7 |
N0R2 |
95.4 |
1106.2 |
the gates deviate from their nominal values, i.e. [49],
dr(gi) = daomm⅛) + ξrtgilgi, (4.4)
where (grɪ ) is the nominal delay for rising transition and lgi is the varia-
tion for the gate gi and ξrι3i is a constant coefficient. Table 4.1 shows the constant
coefficients for NAND2 gate. Similarly for the falling transition,
dʃ(^) = dy0mmal(<7j) + ξf,gilgi. (4.5)
Thus, Equation 4.3 becomes
43
More intriguing information
1. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES2. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
3. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
4. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
5. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. GOVERNANÇA E MECANISMOS DE CONTROLE SOCIAL EM REDES ORGANIZACIONAIS
10. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry