The name is absent



Gallup World Poll, 2006

“Now, please think about yesterday, from the morning until the end of the day. Think about where you were,
what you were doing, who you were with, and how you felt.”

Would you like to have more days like

66.9

0.032**

МЦ0.120***

yesterday?

(0.016)

(0.007)

Did you feel well rested?

65.7

*0.027*

***0.067***

(0.014)

(0.006)

Were you treated with respect?

84.6

***0.146***

***0.135***

(0.028)

(0.008)

Were you able to choose how you spent your

70.0

*0.035*

***0.030***

time all day?

(0.018)

(0.006)

Did you smile or laugh a lot yesterday?

70.6

***0.103***

***0.148***

(0.017)

(0.007)

Were you proud of something you did?

59.3

0.012

***0.120***

(0.023)

(0.007)

Did you learn or do something interesting?

52.5

0.029

***0.149***

(0.022)

(0.007)

Did you eat good tasting food?

74.1

***0.194***

***0.222***

(0.021)

(0.007)

Notes: The (binary) dependent variable in each regression is the answer (yes or no) to the survey question. All regressions control for
respondent gender, a quartic in age, their interaction, and indicators for missing age or gender. Numbers in parentheses are robust standard
errors. Asterisks indicate statistical significance at the *10 percent, **5 percent, and ***1 percent level.

Between-country estimates: Probit regression of affect measure on log real GDP per capita, clustering standard errors by country. Sample
sizes vary by question, but the Gallup World Poll typically yielded around 134,000 respondents from 130 countries, while the World Values
Survey yielded around 66,000 respondents from 31 or 32 countries with nationally representative samples.

Within-country estimates: Probit regression on log household income, further controlling for country fixed effects (and hence exploiting only
within-country income comparisons). Because these regressions also require valid household income data, the sample size was smaller:
typically the Gallup World Poll yielded around 100,000 respondents from 113 countries, while the World Values Survey yielded around
42,000 respondents from 24 countries.

Tables—9



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
4. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
5. The name is absent
6. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
7. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
8. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
9. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
10. The name is absent
11. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
12. The name is absent
13. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
17. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Survey of Literature on Covered and Uncovered Interest Parities