Table B1. Influence of Non-Representative Samples in the World Values Survey
|
Dependent variable: Sample: |
Life Satisfaction |
Happiness Representative samples All observations | ||
|
Representative samples All |
observations | |||
|
Panel 1: Comparisons between countries, coefficient on log real GDP per capita | ||||
|
(Comparison of results in Table 1 with the full sample) | ||||
|
1981-84 wave |
0.498* |
0.510** |
0.569** |
■*0.596*** |
|
(0.252) |
(0.230) |
(0.230) |
(0.193) | |
|
1989-93 wave |
***0.558*** * |
**0.210*** |
***0.708*** |
**0.260** |
|
(0.096) |
(0.073) |
(0.123) |
(0.098) | |
|
1994-99 wave |
***0.462*** * |
**0.323*** |
***0.354*** |
***0.214*** |
|
(0.051) |
(0.069) |
(0.058) |
(0.069) | |
|
1999-2004 wave |
***0.346*** * |
**0.347*** |
0.126* |
*0.0125* |
|
(0.046) |
(0.045) |
(0.073) |
(0.072) | |
|
Combined, with |
***0.398*** * |
**0.318*** |
***0.244*** |
***0.181*** |
|
wave fixed effects |
(0.040) |
(0.052) |
(0.063) |
(0.063) |
|
Panel 2: Comparisons within countries, coefficient on log household income, controlling for country fixed effects | ||||
|
(Comparison of results in Table 2 with the full sample) | ||||
|
1981-84 wave |
0.199*** |
0.199*** |
0.281*** |
■*0.281*** |
|
(0.022) |
(0.022) |
(0.023) |
(0.023) | |
|
1989-93 wave |
***0.153*** * |
**0.145*** |
***0.188*** |
***0.190*** |
|
(0.011) |
(0.010) |
(0.013) |
(0.011) | |
|
1994-99 wave |
***0.243*** * |
**0.250*** |
***0.209*** |
***0.217*** |
|
(0.013) |
(0.012) |
(0.013) |
(0.013) | |
|
1999-2004 wave |
***0.286*** * |
**0.274*** |
***0.248*** |
***0.245*** |
|
(0.007) |
(0.007) |
(0.008) |
(0.008) | |
|
Combined, with |
***0.249*** * |
**0.237*** |
***0.234*** |
***0.231*** |
|
country × wave effects |
(0.007) |
(0.007) |
(0.008) |
(0.008) |
|
Panel 3: Comparisons between countries and over time, coefficient on log real GDP per capita | ||||
|
(Comparison of results in Table 3 with the full sample) | ||||
|
Levels |
0.414*** |
0.339*** |
0.230*** |
■*0.181*** |
|
(0.041) |
(0.053) |
(0.064) |
(0.061) | |
|
Levels with country |
***0.301*** |
0.151 |
***0.363*** |
**0.283** |
|
fixed effects |
(0.091) |
(0.136) |
(0.131) |
(0.128) |
|
Levels w/ country & |
***0.552*** |
*0.253* |
0.216 |
0.009 |
|
wave fixed effects |
(0.118) |
(0.192) |
(0.187) |
(0.170) |
|
Short differences |
***0.596*** * |
**0.407*** |
0.215 |
0.081 |
|
(0.082) |
(0.122) |
(0.136) |
(0.122) | |
|
Long differences |
***0.314*** |
0.172 |
0.114 |
-0.025 |
|
(0.072) |
(0.118) |
(0.103) |
(0.117) | |
Notes: Table reports results of regressions of well-being on the indicated income variable, both in the nationally-representative World Values
Survey samples analyzed in the main text and in the entire sample. Numbers in parentheses are robust standard errors. Asterisks indicate
statistically significant from zero at the *10 percent, **5 percent, and ***1 percent level.
Representative samples: Columns 1 and 3 include only nationally representative country-wave samples, yielding 234,093 life satisfaction
respondents (and 228,159 happiness respondents) in 166 (165) country-waves, from 79 countries. Results in the middle panel also require
household income data, reducing sample to 117, 481 (or 117,299) respondents, 93 (94) country-waves, and 59 countries.
All observations: Columns 2 and 4 include all country-waves, including non-nationally representative samples described in this appendix. This
broader sample yields an extra 25,582 satisfaction respondents (and 26,365 happiness respondents), from 17 (18) more country-waves, adding 1,
7, 7, and 2 countries to the satisfaction (and 1, 7, 8, and 2 to the happiness) samples, respectively, in waves 1-4), yielding 13 (14) more short first
differences and 6 (7) more long first differences and resulting in a total sample of 82 countries. Results in the middle panel 2 also require
household income data, and so the broader sample yielded only 9,968 extra satisfaction respondents (and 9,946 extra happiness respondents),
from 6 country-waves for a total of 61 countries.
Panel 1: National well-being index is regressed on log real GDP per capita. The well-being index is calculated in a previous ordered probit
regression of well-being on country × wave fixed effects. Standard errors are clustered by country. See the notes to table 1 for further details.
Panel 2: Results of ordered probit regressions of respondent-level well-being on log household income, controlling for country fixed effects, or
country × wave fixed effects plus a quartic in age, gender, their interaction, and indicators for missing age or sex. See notes to table 2 for details.
Panel 3: National well-being index is regressed on log real GDP per capita, pooling together observations from all four waves of the survey.
National well-being index is calculated in a previous ordered probit regression of well-being on country × wave fixed effects. Standard errors are
clustered by country. See the notes to table 3 for further details.
Tables—11
More intriguing information
1. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE2. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
3. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS
4. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
5. The name is absent
6. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
7. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
8. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
9. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
10. The name is absent