On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions



Substitution into (A5) yields:

(A9)

L

s s=0


- (μi - μ2) δ (1 - t)


dF(w) + (μ -μ2)δT

w


dF ( w )


+ (μi - μ2)


dF ( w ).


Consider next, the following optimization problem, where an individual, given some
choice of the level of charitable contributions,
z, is choosing the level of the
consumption good,
c, and leisure, l. Formulating the Lagrangean yields:

(A10) L(w, z, t,τ, s) max[h(l) + u(c) +ν[(1 -t) w(1-l) +T -c-(1 +s) z]],
where
ν denotes the Lagrange multiplier. Re-examining the effect of the small
perturbation in the tax system around the optimum, by fully differentiating the
Lagrangean in (A10), using the envelope theorem, yields:

(A11) di,=0, t,r =∆∙v[-.■ + δ-[(1 -1 ) w(1 -1 ) + T ]].

Denote by z*(w) , the optimal choice of the level of charitable contributions of the
individual with ability
w, given the optimal tax system. By construction of the optimal
choice of the individual given the optimal tax system prior to the perturbation, it
follows that:

(A12)


v[z*(w)]
z


L[w,z*(w)]


z


=0.


s=0,t,T


After the perturbation, it follows, by virtue of (A11), that for any zz*(w),

dLs=0, t,T


> 0 ; whereas, for any zz*( w ), dLs=0, t, T


< 0. Thus,


(A13)


L[w, z*(w)]


L[w, z* (w)]


z


s=ds,t+dt,T+dT



s=0,t,T


This implies that:

24



More intriguing information

1. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
2. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
6. The name is absent
7. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls
8. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
9. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
10. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region