Appendices
INSTITUTION |
LEVEL |
MANAGEMENT FUNCTION |
STRENGTHS_____________ |
WEAKNESSES_______________________ | |||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 | ||||
Navy |
Provincial |
** |
• Human resources available • Full authority (SK Pangab) • Means available • Budget available • Good reputation in the |
• Operate only at the provincial level • Patrol deep water areas, not inshore • Collaboration and coordination with | |||||||
Dept, of |
Provincial District Sub-district |
* |
* |
** ** |
** ** |
* |
* |
• Human resources • Operational budget available • Authority (supported by law) • Authority • Close to the activities |
• Motivation poor • Supporting means limited • Motivation poor • Means limited • Operational budget small • Human resources weak • Authority insufficient • Money and means limited • Human resources inadequate__________________ | ||
Environment |
Provincial |
• Human resources inadequate • Weak laws • No role in coordination • Jurisdiction and authority unclear • Relationship with environment section of ____BAPPEDA is unclear_______________________ | |||||||||
Dept. Forestry |
Provincial |
• Direct authority under CITES |
• Budget and means limited • Motivation weak • Jurisdiction unclear • Limited to protected species and national parks; | ||||||||
Law Bureau |
Provincial |
• Works well with Fisheries | |||||||||
Regional and |
Provincial |
* |
* |
* |
* |
• Human resources available • Motivation • Close to the activity |
• Authority unclear relative to provincial • Budget and means limited • Extremely busy | ||||
Village |
Village |
** |
• Motivation • Direct access to fishers • Traditional institutions in • Social and cultural legitimacy |
• Authority unclea • Budget and means limited • Heavy workload • "Top-down" system • Adat institutions lack legal standing |