Markets for Influence



This paper is organised as follows. Section 2 formally defines the strategic
equivalence between the two classes of games. Section 3 then discusses the
implications of such equivalence by recasting contests as markets for influence.
Section 4 concludes.

2 Tullock Contests and Cournot Competition

Our starting point is the most well-known model of contests, namely, the Tullock
rent-seeking game. This class of games can be represented by a set of n players,
who choose effort levels
e1,e2,...,en in order to win a prize of fixed value V,
and a parameter
R> O. The winner of the contest is the player who spends the
most effort. Player Ps payoff in this class of games is given by:

ɛ^

πi(eι,e2 ,...,en) = V —--ei.                       (1)

∑ef
J

The equilibria for this family of games (both symmetric and asymmetric, pure
and mixed-strategy) are well-known.2

To develop the isomorphism with oligopoly games, consider now a unit elas-
ticity demand curve with normalisation such that:

V

P = ——

Σ⅞,∙

J

and assume that Ps cost function is given by
player
i is


C»(q»)


1

= ¾r . Thus, the revenue for


Vqi
ri = —--

∑q,∙


7
ci


Therefore, we can write Ps payoff as follows :

C                  X            f'7

πi(cχ, c2, ..., cn) = V —----

∑V

J


- ci.                           (2)


Thus, incentives in the oligopoly game, with Ci as the strategic variable, are
strategically equivalent to those in a standard Tullock contest with
ei substituted
for
Ci. That is, we have established the following result:

2See, for example, Baye, Kovenock and de Vries (1994). Importantly, Baye and Hoppe
(2003) show that this family of games is isomorphic to certain innovation and patent-race
games. It follows then that our main result also applies to these other classes of games. That
is, there are isomorphisms between oligopoly games and specific innovation and patent-race
games.



More intriguing information

1. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
2. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
3. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
4. The name is absent
5. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
6. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
7. The name is absent
8. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
9. The name is absent
10. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design