The name is absent

Figure 1: Kernel estimates of the distribution of weekly returns.

and

Table 3 presents the results of the maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters
of the marginals. In the table we present also the values of the averaged Ioglikelihood
function at maximum. Then, we have obtained the following maximum likelihood esti-
mates of the parameters ɑ in the three cases considered:

	^0.0000	0.0702 0.0476	0.0000 0.0000	0.1072∖ 0.0357
«SST =			0.0491	0.0342 0.0000/
	/0.0000	0.0730	0.0000	0.1095∖
«SGSH =	∖	0.0467	0.0000 0.0419	0.0363 0.0338 0.0000/
	<0.0000	0.0728	0.0000	0.1086∖
<*SEP =		0.0473	0.0000 0.0385	0.0358 0.0332 0.0000/

with the values of the averaged Ioglikelihood function at maximum, respectively, equal
to 12.9449, 12.9496 and 12.9415³.

Note that the three marginals have a similar behaviour, also if the shape parameter
of the skew Student-t for the NASCOMP index is lower than 4 and, as a consequence,
it has not kurtosis index. Also the structure of ɑ is very similar in the three cases
considered, confirming what we have writtem in the previous section.

³We have used a quasi-Newton algorithm to obtain the maximum of Ioglikelihood functions.

More intriguing information

1. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
2. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
3. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
4. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
5. The name is absent
6. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
7. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
8. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?
9. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
10. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM