Skew Student-t Distribution
Association Kendall’s Correlation
parameters coefficients coefficients
|
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.3293 |
0.3250 |
0.3299 |
0.3979 |
0.3887 |
0.4104 |
|
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.3933 |
0.3977 |
0.0451 |
0.4948 |
0.5028 |
0.0608 |
|
0.50 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.4805 |
0.0170 |
0.0164 |
0.6698 |
0.0412 |
0.0358 |
|
0.10 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.6430 |
0.1495 |
0.0760 |
0.7403 |
0.2261 |
0.1165 |
|
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.1473 |
0.1431 |
0.1471 |
0.2140 |
0.2009 |
0.1992 |
|
1.00 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.2785 |
0.0628 |
0.0617 |
0.4319 |
0.0939 |
0.0895 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.1455 |
0.0778 |
0.0761 |
0.2301 |
0.1127 |
0.1048 |
|
5.00 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.0893 |
0.0158 |
0.0054 |
0.1570 |
0.0298 |
0.0078 |
|
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
0.0235 |
0.0285 |
0.0252 |
0.0418 |
0.0447 |
0.0416 |
|
Skew Generalized Secant Hyperbolic Distribution | ||||||||
|
Association |
Kendall’s coefficients |
Correlation coefficients | ||||||
|
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.3231 |
0.3256 |
0.3248 |
0.3827 |
0.3824 |
0.3953 |
|
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.3965 |
0.3943 |
0.0447 |
0.4847 |
0.4737 |
0.0520 |
|
0.50 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.4806 |
0.0177 |
0.0159 |
0.6637 |
0.0422 |
0.0416 |
|
0.10 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.6416 |
0.1487 |
0.0755 |
0.7294 |
0.2234 |
0.1161 |
|
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.1429 |
0.1427 |
0.1443 |
0.2045 |
0.1944 |
0.1884 |
|
1.00 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.2791 |
0.0640 |
0.0611 |
0.4277 |
0.0921 |
0.0906 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.1431 |
0.0799 |
0.0786 |
0.2324 |
0.1142 |
0.1068 |
|
5.00 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.0925 |
0.0201 |
0.0048 |
0.1628 |
0.0354 |
0.0072 |
|
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
0.0219 |
0.0217 |
0.0209 |
0.0360 |
0.0356 |
0.0312 |
|
Skew Exponential Power Distribution | ||||||||
|
Association |
Kendall’s coefficients |
Correlation coefficients | ||||||
|
parameters | ||||||||
|
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.3231 |
0.3256 |
0.3248 |
0.3819 |
0.3820 |
0.3954 |
|
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.3965 |
0.3943 |
0.0447 |
0.4812 |
0.4709 |
0.0517 |
|
0.50 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.4806 |
0.0177 |
0.0159 |
0.6621 |
0.0421 |
0.0416 |
|
0.10 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.6416 |
0.1487 |
0.0755 |
0.7265 |
0.2229 |
0.1160 |
|
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.1429 |
0.1427 |
0.1443 |
0.2034 |
0.1935 |
0.1874 |
|
1.00 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.2791 |
0.0640 |
0.0611 |
0.4271 |
0.0917 |
0.0902 |
|
1.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.1431 |
0.0799 |
0.0786 |
0.2319 |
0.1137 |
0.1063 |
|
5.00 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.0925 |
0.0201 |
0.0048 |
0.1626 |
0.0354 |
0.0071 |
|
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
0.0219 |
0.0217 |
0.0209 |
0.0358 |
0.0355 |
0.0312 |
Table 1: Correlation and Kendall’s coefficients for tt∩ = «22 = ''l33 = 0 and marginals with
zero mean, unit variance, skewness equal to -0.5, 0, 0.5 and kurtosis equal to 5, 6, 8.
More intriguing information
1. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies2. Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics
3. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
4. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
5. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
6. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
7. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
8. The name is absent
9. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
10. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules