ln∕t — In ∕⅛-ι, where It indicates the price at time t, obtaining a sample of T = 854
returns. Table 2 reports preliminary statistics for the four return series, and gives the
mean, median, minimum, maximum, standard deviation and skewness and kurtosis
indices.
The nonparametric densities with normal kernel of the distributions of the returns is
given in hg. I2. From the latter hgure, also if the distributions have fat tails, it is difficult
to identify their shape. Moreover, since multivariate skewness and curtosis indices are
equal, respectively, to 2.246 and 61.523, the data are not normally distributed.
Finally, if we express the depedence structure of the four indices with the correlation
index, we obtain the following matrix;
/1.0000 |
0.8196 |
0.3684 |
0.8877∖ | |
ŋ _ |
1.0000 |
0.3697 |
0.7694 | |
it — |
1.0000 |
0.3697 | ||
∖ |
1.0000/ | |||
while if we use the Kendall’ |
s tau we |
obtain: | ||
fl.0000 |
0.6347 |
0.2499 |
0.6807∖ | |
ʌ |
1.0000 |
0.2421 |
0.5517 | |
T — |
1.0000 |
0.4578 | ||
1.0000/ |
Note the high dependence of SfePCOMP with NASCOMP and MSACWFL.
SfePCOMP |
NASCOMP |
JAPA500 |
MSACWFL | |
Mean |
0.0017 |
0.0020 |
-0.0004 |
0.0012 |
Median |
0.0035 |
0.0052 |
0.0007 |
0.0028 |
Min |
-0.1218 |
-0.1646 |
-0.1181 |
-0.0931 |
Max |
0.1237 |
0.1272 |
0.1523 |
0.0898 |
StDev |
0.0225 |
0.0341 |
0.0294 |
0.0199 |
Skewness |
-0.1806 |
-0.6725 |
0.0330 |
-0.4371 |
Kurtosis |
5.9210 |
6.0317 |
5.1286 |
5.6514 |
Table 2: Summary statistics for weekly returns.
4.2 Parameter estimation and results
We have adapted to the four series of returns the KS distribution with marginals skew
Student t, generalized secant hyperbolic and exponential power seen in the previous
section. According to the IFM (inference for margins) method (Joe and Xu, 1996), the
parameters of the marginals have been estimated distinctly from the parameters of the
KS function. In other words, the process of estimation has been divided in the following
steps:
i) estimating the location, scale, skewness and kurtosis parameters of marginal dis-
tributions using the maximum likelihood method:
ii) estimating the KS parameter ɑ, always with the maximum likelihood method,
given the estimations performed in step (i).
2The bandwidth of the nonparametric densities has been obtained with the Sheather and Jones method
(Sheater and Jones, 1991).
More intriguing information
1. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies2. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
3. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
4. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
5. The name is absent
6. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics
7. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
8. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
9. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
10. The name is absent