Table 2
NLLS Estimates of Bankruptcy Cost Parameter μ
Period |
Obs. |
Estimate |
Std. Err. a |
Adj. R^i |
Pr > λRb |
Pr > λιc |
1997Q2 |
327 |
0.131 |
0.037 |
018 |
< . 01 |
019 |
1997Q3 |
349 |
0.105 |
0.022 |
0.88 |
<.01 |
0.15 |
1997Q4 |
368 |
0.139 |
0.035 |
0.88 |
<.01 |
0.57 |
1998Q1 |
392 |
0.080 |
0.047 |
0.87 |
<.01 |
0.68 |
1998Q2 |
399 |
0.074 |
0.028 |
0.83 |
<.01 |
0.72 |
1998Q3 |
427 |
0.074 |
0.034 |
0.84 |
<.01 |
0.39 |
1998Q4 |
442 |
0.228 |
0.044 |
0.85 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
1999Q1 |
458 |
0.145 |
0.037 |
0.81 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
1999Q2 |
460 |
0.112 |
0.031 |
0.77 |
<.01 |
0.05 |
1999Q3 |
438 |
0.088 |
0.047 |
0.72 |
<.01 |
0.29 |
1999Q4 |
442 |
0.165 |
0.043 |
0.69 |
<.01 |
0.16 |
2000Q1 |
463 |
0.188 |
0.056 |
0.69 |
<.01 |
0.53 |
2000Q2 |
476 |
0.273 |
0.055 |
0.71 |
<.01 |
0.59 |
2000Q3 |
487 |
0.253 |
0.039 |
0.70 |
<.01 |
0.12 |
2000Q4 |
492 |
0.458 |
0.069 |
0.65 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2001Q1 |
490 |
0.406 |
0.069 |
0.62 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2001Q2 |
500 |
0.463 |
0.079 |
0.70 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2001Q3 |
489 |
0.386 |
0.075 |
0.73 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2001Q4 |
480 |
0.372 |
0.070 |
0.74 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2002Q1 |
497 |
0.291 |
0.062 |
0.76 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2002Q2 |
508 |
0.292 |
0.062 |
0.75 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2002Q3 |
502 |
0.359 |
0.064 |
0.76 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2002Q4 |
523 |
0.444 |
0.052 |
0.73 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2003Q1 |
537 |
0.330 |
0.039 |
0.77 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2003Q2 |
523 |
0.164 |
0.029 |
0.77 |
<.01 |
<.01 |
2003Q3 |
520 |
0.186 |
0.041 |
0.77 |
< . 01 |
< . 01 |
Notes: In every period, the sample excludes firms with leverage ratios below the
2.5th percentile and above the 97.5th percentile, firms with credit spreads above the
97.5th percentile, and firms with EDFs at exactly 20%.
aComputed using a heteroscedasticity-consistent asymptotic covariance matrix; see White
(1980).
bp-value for the likelihood ratio test statistic λR of the exclusion of fixed credit rating
effects.
cp-value for the likelihood ratio test statistic λI of the exclusion of fixed industry effects.
25
More intriguing information
1. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots2. Voting by Committees under Constraints
3. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
4. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
5. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION
6. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
7. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
8. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
9. The name is absent
10. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS