Table 3
NLLS Estimates of Bankruptcy Cost Parameter μ
Period |
Obs. |
Estimate |
Std. Err. a |
Adj. R2 |
Pr > λIb |
1997Q2 |
327 |
0.144 |
0.041 |
045 |
< . 01 |
1997Q3 |
349 |
0.105 |
0.029 |
0.41 |
<.01 |
1997Q4 |
368 |
0.139 |
0.040 |
0.47 |
<.01 |
1998Q1 |
392 |
0.080 |
0.051 |
0.40 |
<.01 |
1998Q2 |
399 |
0.074 |
0.030 |
0.36 |
<.01 |
1998Q3 |
427 |
0.074 |
0.032 |
0.38 |
<.01 |
1998Q4 |
442 |
0.239 |
0.046 |
0.49 |
<.01 |
1999Q1 |
458 |
0.163 |
0.038 |
0.48 |
<.01 |
1999Q2 |
460 |
0.121 |
0.031 |
0.49 |
<.01 |
1999Q3 |
438 |
0.106 |
0.044 |
0.42 |
<.01 |
1999Q4 |
442 |
0.178 |
0.048 |
0.49 |
<.01 |
2000Q1 |
463 |
0.193 |
0.052 |
0.52 |
<.01 |
2000Q2 |
476 |
0.275 |
0.050 |
0.56 |
<.01 |
2000Q3 |
487 |
0.262 |
0.038 |
0.59 |
<.01 |
2000Q4 |
492 |
0.496 |
0.063 |
0.58 |
<.01 |
2001Q1 |
490 |
0.472 |
0.064 |
0.52 |
<.01 |
2001Q2 |
500 |
0.485 |
0.077 |
0.60 |
<.01 |
2001Q3 |
489 |
0.400 |
0.078 |
0.58 |
<.01 |
2001Q4 |
480 |
0.401 |
0.079 |
0.53 |
<.01 |
2002Q1 |
497 |
0.291 |
0.058 |
0.52 |
<.01 |
2002Q2 |
508 |
0.290 |
0.062 |
0.53 |
<.01 |
2002Q3 |
502 |
0.349 |
0.062 |
0.54 |
<.01 |
2002Q4 |
523 |
0.443 |
0.055 |
0.54 |
<.01 |
2003Q1 |
537 |
0.342 |
0.040 |
0.54 |
<.01 |
2003Q2 |
523 |
0.186 |
0.029 |
0.47 |
<.01 |
2003Q3 |
520 |
0.203 |
0.043 |
0.46 |
< . 01 |
Notes: In every period, the sample excludes firms with leverage ratios below
the 2.5th percentile and above the 97.5th percentile, firms with credit spreads above
the 97.5th percentile, and firms with EDFs at exactly 20%.
aComputed using a heteroscedasticity-consistent asymptotic covariance matrix;
see White (1980).
bp-value for the likelihood ratio test statistic λI of the exclusion of fixed industry
effects.
32
More intriguing information
1. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
5. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
6. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
7. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
8. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
9. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
10. The name is absent