Table 3
NLLS Estimates of Bankruptcy Cost Parameter μ
|
Period |
Obs. |
Estimate |
Std. Err. a |
Adj. R2 |
Pr > λIb |
|
1997Q2 |
327 |
0.144 |
0.041 |
045 |
< . 01 |
|
1997Q3 |
349 |
0.105 |
0.029 |
0.41 |
<.01 |
|
1997Q4 |
368 |
0.139 |
0.040 |
0.47 |
<.01 |
|
1998Q1 |
392 |
0.080 |
0.051 |
0.40 |
<.01 |
|
1998Q2 |
399 |
0.074 |
0.030 |
0.36 |
<.01 |
|
1998Q3 |
427 |
0.074 |
0.032 |
0.38 |
<.01 |
|
1998Q4 |
442 |
0.239 |
0.046 |
0.49 |
<.01 |
|
1999Q1 |
458 |
0.163 |
0.038 |
0.48 |
<.01 |
|
1999Q2 |
460 |
0.121 |
0.031 |
0.49 |
<.01 |
|
1999Q3 |
438 |
0.106 |
0.044 |
0.42 |
<.01 |
|
1999Q4 |
442 |
0.178 |
0.048 |
0.49 |
<.01 |
|
2000Q1 |
463 |
0.193 |
0.052 |
0.52 |
<.01 |
|
2000Q2 |
476 |
0.275 |
0.050 |
0.56 |
<.01 |
|
2000Q3 |
487 |
0.262 |
0.038 |
0.59 |
<.01 |
|
2000Q4 |
492 |
0.496 |
0.063 |
0.58 |
<.01 |
|
2001Q1 |
490 |
0.472 |
0.064 |
0.52 |
<.01 |
|
2001Q2 |
500 |
0.485 |
0.077 |
0.60 |
<.01 |
|
2001Q3 |
489 |
0.400 |
0.078 |
0.58 |
<.01 |
|
2001Q4 |
480 |
0.401 |
0.079 |
0.53 |
<.01 |
|
2002Q1 |
497 |
0.291 |
0.058 |
0.52 |
<.01 |
|
2002Q2 |
508 |
0.290 |
0.062 |
0.53 |
<.01 |
|
2002Q3 |
502 |
0.349 |
0.062 |
0.54 |
<.01 |
|
2002Q4 |
523 |
0.443 |
0.055 |
0.54 |
<.01 |
|
2003Q1 |
537 |
0.342 |
0.040 |
0.54 |
<.01 |
|
2003Q2 |
523 |
0.186 |
0.029 |
0.47 |
<.01 |
|
2003Q3 |
520 |
0.203 |
0.043 |
0.46 |
< . 01 |
Notes: In every period, the sample excludes firms with leverage ratios below
the 2.5th percentile and above the 97.5th percentile, firms with credit spreads above
the 97.5th percentile, and firms with EDFs at exactly 20%.
aComputed using a heteroscedasticity-consistent asymptotic covariance matrix;
see White (1980).
bp-value for the likelihood ratio test statistic λI of the exclusion of fixed industry
effects.
32
More intriguing information
1. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities2. The name is absent
3. EU enlargement and environmental policy
4. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
5. The name is absent
6. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
7. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS
8. The name is absent
9. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
10. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures