Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model



Dt =---—----Dt- 1--K----Ft +--K----NW +--Xt----.

1 — κ (1 — q )         1 — κ (1 — q )      1 — κ (1 — q )        1 — κ (1 — q )

The second equation can be exposed as:

Ft = — Dt-1 1 — K (1 q ) Dt + NW + Xt.
κκ   κ

YY- Dt 1 κ (1 q ) E[Dt +1] + NW + E[Xt+1] = 1 (1 - q)κ
κ         κ                     κ        γY β

YY D1-1 1 — κ<1 q) Dt + NW + Xt 1 + W   ∙, ) I 2 β I . I κ I Dt +

L κ t 1 κ t +     + κ J +             YY β              t +

+ βγγ + (1 q)κ 1NW + (1 — q) Xt + 1  (1 q)κ E1 Zt +11.

YY β                      YY β     α

(77)

(78)

(79)


Putting all the terms in D on the left-hand side, we obtain the following expression:

1 κ (1 q ) E [ Dt +1∣ + γγ Dt +
κκ


1 (1 q )κ 1 κ (1 q ) D l

-----D--Dt +

YY β       κ


17 (1 q) [yYβ [1 (1 q)κ]] n 1 (1 — q) κγγ

E--------------------Dt--γγγβ~-D 1 -

= 1 (1 q)κ NW + 1 (1 q)κ Xt + βγγ + (1 q)κ 1NW +

Yγβ            Yγβ    κ         Yγβ

—NW + (1 — q) Xt E[Xt+1] + 1 (1 ~ q)κ E1 Zt +1].
κ        Yγ β     α

(80)


It can be simplified as:

E[Dt+1]


Yy    d 1 (1 — q)κ D + (1 q) γYβ [1 (1 q)κ]]      κ D +

1 — κ (1 — q ) t       γγ β      t               γγ β             1 — κ (1 — q ) t

+ βDt 1


—NW

Yγβ


ɪ Xt

Yγβ


βγγ [(1 — q ) κ — 1] κ

Yy β        1 — κ (1 — q )


κ

— κ (1 — q )


NW +


--K----7 (1 — q)Xt +-----1----?E[Xt +1] — ——E1 Zt+1]. (81)

1 — κ(1 — q)(    q)  t +1 — κ(1 — q)  [ t+1]   yyβ  La  t+1J  ()

The left-hand side of the equation has exactly the same structure as the one in Ft and clearly the
simplification is identical. We will now study the different parts of the right-end side, starting with
net worth.

K_nw _ βιγ - [(1 - q)κ - 1]---κ---NW +---κ---NW.

(82)


Yy β               Yy β        1 — κ (1 — q )       1 — κ (1 — q )

Under a common denominator we obtain the following result:

K [1 κ (1 q )] βYγκ + [(1 q )κ 1] κ + Yy βκ     = 0

YY β [1 — K (1 — q )]                           .

As a consequence the impact of net worth on deposits is null, as we would intuitively expect. The
direct effect of interest rates is due to:

1K                             1

YYβXt 1 — K(1 — q) (1 q)Xt + 1 — K(1 — q) E[Xt+1].

Or:

YYβκ(1 q) + [1 κ(1 q)] X +      1 x

Yy β [1 κ (1 q )]        1   1 κ (1 q ) *+1

26



More intriguing information

1. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
2. The Impact of Financial Openness on Economic Integration: Evidence from the Europe and the Cis
3. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
4. The name is absent
5. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
6. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
7. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
8. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent