Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry: a Dynamic Model



Dt =---—----Dt- 1--K----Ft +--K----NW +--Xt----.

1 — κ (1 — q )         1 — κ (1 — q )      1 — κ (1 — q )        1 — κ (1 — q )

The second equation can be exposed as:

Ft = — Dt-1 1 — K (1 q ) Dt + NW + Xt.
κκ   κ

YY- Dt 1 κ (1 q ) E[Dt +1] + NW + E[Xt+1] = 1 (1 - q)κ
κ         κ                     κ        γY β

YY D1-1 1 — κ<1 q) Dt + NW + Xt 1 + W   ∙, ) I 2 β I . I κ I Dt +

L κ t 1 κ t +     + κ J +             YY β              t +

+ βγγ + (1 q)κ 1NW + (1 — q) Xt + 1  (1 q)κ E1 Zt +11.

YY β                      YY β     α

(77)

(78)

(79)


Putting all the terms in D on the left-hand side, we obtain the following expression:

1 κ (1 q ) E [ Dt +1∣ + γγ Dt +
κκ


1 (1 q )κ 1 κ (1 q ) D l

-----D--Dt +

YY β       κ


17 (1 q) [yYβ [1 (1 q)κ]] n 1 (1 — q) κγγ

E--------------------Dt--γγγβ~-D 1 -

= 1 (1 q)κ NW + 1 (1 q)κ Xt + βγγ + (1 q)κ 1NW +

Yγβ            Yγβ    κ         Yγβ

—NW + (1 — q) Xt E[Xt+1] + 1 (1 ~ q)κ E1 Zt +1].
κ        Yγ β     α

(80)


It can be simplified as:

E[Dt+1]


Yy    d 1 (1 — q)κ D + (1 q) γYβ [1 (1 q)κ]]      κ D +

1 — κ (1 — q ) t       γγ β      t               γγ β             1 — κ (1 — q ) t

+ βDt 1


—NW

Yγβ


ɪ Xt

Yγβ


βγγ [(1 — q ) κ — 1] κ

Yy β        1 — κ (1 — q )


κ

— κ (1 — q )


NW +


--K----7 (1 — q)Xt +-----1----?E[Xt +1] — ——E1 Zt+1]. (81)

1 — κ(1 — q)(    q)  t +1 — κ(1 — q)  [ t+1]   yyβ  La  t+1J  ()

The left-hand side of the equation has exactly the same structure as the one in Ft and clearly the
simplification is identical. We will now study the different parts of the right-end side, starting with
net worth.

K_nw _ βιγ - [(1 - q)κ - 1]---κ---NW +---κ---NW.

(82)


Yy β               Yy β        1 — κ (1 — q )       1 — κ (1 — q )

Under a common denominator we obtain the following result:

K [1 κ (1 q )] βYγκ + [(1 q )κ 1] κ + Yy βκ     = 0

YY β [1 — K (1 — q )]                           .

As a consequence the impact of net worth on deposits is null, as we would intuitively expect. The
direct effect of interest rates is due to:

1K                             1

YYβXt 1 — K(1 — q) (1 q)Xt + 1 — K(1 — q) E[Xt+1].

Or:

YYβκ(1 q) + [1 κ(1 q)] X +      1 x

Yy β [1 κ (1 q )]        1   1 κ (1 q ) *+1

26



More intriguing information

1. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
2. The name is absent
3. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
4. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach
5. The name is absent
6. Hemmnisse für die Vernetzungen von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft abbauen
7. Moffett and rhetoric
8. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
9. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
10. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
11. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
12. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
13. Aktive Klienten - Aktive Politik? (Wie) Läßt sich dauerhafte Unabhängigkeit von Sozialhilfe erreichen? Ein Literaturbericht
14. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
18. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
19. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
20. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?