Example 1: Group teaching practice with midway changeover - 12 trainees, 2 groups of learners
|
Number |
________________1________________ |
_________2_________ |
________3________ |
_______4_______ |
_________5________ |
________6_______ |
________7________ |
_________8_________ |
_________9_________ |
_______10 |
________11 |
_______12_______ |
|
Day |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
|
Date |
12th Sept |
14th Sept |
19th Sept |
21st Sept |
26th Sept |
28th Sept |
3rd Oct |
5th Oct |
10th Oct |
12th Oct |
17th Oct |
19th Oct |
|
Group/Tutor |
DM |
DM |
DM |
JS |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
|
■? |
NoTP |
Amanda |
Amanda |
Amanda |
LaLita |
NicoLa |
Nicola |
MicheLLe |
BiLqueece |
BiLqueece |
Nina |
Alia |
|
try I |
NoTP |
David |
David |
David |
Amanda |
Sarah |
Sarah |
Nicola |
Michelle |
Michelle |
BiLqueece |
Nina |
|
ω θ |
NoTP |
SaLLy |
Sally |
Sally |
David |
Lalita |
LaLita |
Sarah |
NicoLa |
Nicola |
MicheLLe |
Bilqueece |
|
h |
NoTP |
Katja |
Katja |
Katja |
Sally |
Amanda |
Amanda |
Lalita |
Sarah |
Sarah |
NicoLa |
MicheLLe |
|
ɔ O |
NoTP |
Huma |
Huma |
Huma |
Katja |
David |
David |
Amanda |
LaLita |
LaLita |
Sarah |
Nicola |
|
C |
NoTP |
ALia |
Alia |
Alia |
Huma |
Sally |
Sally |
David |
Amanda |
Amanda |
Lalita |
Sarah |
|
Group/Tutor |
JS |
JS |
JS |
DM |
JS |
JS |
JS |
JS |
JS |
_______JS______ |
_______JS______ |
_______JS_______ |
|
NoTP |
Nina |
Nina |
Nina |
ALia |
Katja |
Katja |
Sally |
David |
David |
Amanda |
LaLita | |
|
try 2 h |
NoTP |
BiLqueece |
Bilqueece |
Bilqueece |
Nina |
Huma |
Huma |
Katja |
SaLLy |
Sally |
David |
Amanda |
|
ω θ |
NoTP |
MicheLLe |
Michelle |
Michelle |
BiLqueece |
ALia |
Huma |
Katja |
Katja |
SaLLy |
David | |
|
ІЛ |
NoTP |
NicoLa |
Nicola |
Nicola |
Michelle |
Nina |
Nina |
Alia |
Huma |
Huma |
Katja |
SaLLy |
|
≈ ω |
NoTP |
Sarah |
Sarah |
Sarah |
Nicola |
Bilqueece |
BiLqueece |
Nina |
ALia |
ALia |
Huma |
Katja |
|
C |
NoTP |
LaLita |
Lalita |
Lalita |
MichelLe |
Michelle |
Bilqueece |
Nina |
Nina |
Alia |
Huma | |
|
Number |
13 |
14 |
_______15 |
16 |
_______17 |
_______18 |
_______19 |
20 |
________21 |
_______22 |
_______23 |
______24______ |
|
Day |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
Tues |
Thurs |
|
Date |
24th Oct |
26th Oct |
31st Oct |
2nd Nov |
7th Nov |
9th Nov |
14th Nov |
16th Nov |
21st Nov |
23rd Nov |
28th Nov |
30th Nov |
|
Group/Tutor |
JS |
JS |
JS_______ |
JS |
JS |
JS |
JS_______ |
JS_______ |
JS |
JS |
JS |
JS_______ |
|
■? |
Alia |
Katja |
Katja |
__________3__________ |
Amanda |
Amanda |
LaLita |
Sarah |
Nicola |
MicheLLe |
MicheLLe |
MicheLLe |
|
try 2h |
Nina |
Huma |
Huma |
Katja |
David |
David |
BiLqueece |
Lalita |
Sarah |
NicoLa |
NicoLa | |
|
3 ξ∙ |
BiLqueece |
ALia |
ALia |
Huma |
Sally |
Sally |
David |
Bilqueece |
Lalita |
Nina |
Sarah | |
|
і |
Michelle |
Nina |
Nina |
Alia |
Katja |
Katja |
Sally |
Nicola |
Bilqueece |
LaLita |
LaLita |
LaLita |
|
» 3 |
NicoLa |
Bilqueece |
BiLqueece |
Nina |
Huma |
Huma |
Katja |
Sally |
David |
Bilqueece |
Amanda |
Amanda |
|
C |
Sarah |
MicheLLe |
Michelle |
Bilqueece |
Alia |
Alia |
Huma |
Katja |
Sally |
David |
SaLLy |
David |
|
Group/Tutor |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
DM |
_ | |
|
■? |
LaLita |
NicoLa |
Nicola |
MicheLle |
Nina |
Nina |
Alia |
Huma |
Katja |
Huma |
Sally |
_ SaLLy |
|
try 2 h |
Amanda |
Sarah |
Sarah |
NicoLa |
BiLqueece |
Bilqueece |
Nina |
David |
Huma |
Katja |
David |
Katja |
|
ω 2 |
David |
LaLita |
Lalita |
Sarah |
Michelle |
MicheLLe |
Amanda |
Alia |
Alia |
Sally |
Katja |
Huma |
|
ІЛ |
SaLLy |
Amanda |
Amanda |
Lalita |
NicoLa |
Nicola |
Michelle |
Nina |
Nina |
Sarah |
Huma |
ALia |
|
≈ Φ |
Katja |
David |
David |
Amanda |
Sarah |
Sarah |
Nicola |
Amanda |
Amanda |
Alia |
ALia |
Nina |
|
C |
Huma |
SaLLy |
Sally |
David |
Lalita |
LaLita |
Sarah |
MicheLLe |
Michelle |
Amanda |
Nina |
BiLqueece |
indicates active teaching role
with name indicates observation
More intriguing information
1. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality2. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
3. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
4. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
5. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
9. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE
10. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters