Similarly player 2 prefers agenda 1 when λ is sufficiently large (at the limit λ>λRe
with λRe = αα1(++α-) 1 ), otherwise, he prefers agenda 2. Since in this case λ cannot be
larger than λGR , then both players prefer agenda 2 if 0<λ<min {λY e, λRe, λGR}
(see fig. 1) otherwise players have different preferences over agendas.

Agreement arises only for 0 <λ<min {λYe,λRe,λGR}
B) Let λB < λ < 1, with λB = VEII+")—α, then Player 1 demands x1 as in (55)
while in Agenda 2 player 1 obtains the entire surplus. Player 1 prefers agenda 1 if
λ > λG with λG = -(1 — a) + 2+ + a2 and agenda 2 otherwise, while Player 2 always
prefers agenda 1 unless α<0.5 and λ is in [λY , 1] with λY
(1—a)-√ 1 —2α
α
. Then,
31
More intriguing information
1. A Rare Presentation of Crohn's Disease2. The name is absent
3. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
4. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
5. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
6. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
7. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany