Similarly player 2 prefers agenda 1 when λ is sufficiently large (at the limit λ>λRe
with λRe = αα1(++α-) 1 ), otherwise, he prefers agenda 2. Since in this case λ cannot be
larger than λGR , then both players prefer agenda 2 if 0<λ<min {λY e, λRe, λGR}
(see fig. 1) otherwise players have different preferences over agendas.

Agreement arises only for 0 <λ<min {λYe,λRe,λGR}
B) Let λB < λ < 1, with λB = VEII+")—α, then Player 1 demands x1 as in (55)
while in Agenda 2 player 1 obtains the entire surplus. Player 1 prefers agenda 1 if
λ > λG with λG = -(1 — a) + 2+ + a2 and agenda 2 otherwise, while Player 2 always
prefers agenda 1 unless α<0.5 and λ is in [λY , 1] with λY
(1—a)-√ 1 —2α
α
. Then,
31
More intriguing information
1. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?2. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
3. Workforce or Workfare?
4. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
5. The name is absent
6. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
7. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica
8. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
9. The name is absent
10. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer