Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games



Similarly player 2 prefers agenda 1 when λ is sufficiently large (at the limit λ>λRe

with λRe = αα1(++α-) 1 ), otherwise, he prefers agenda 2. Since in this case λ cannot be
larger than λ
GR , then both players prefer agenda 2 if 0<λ<min {λY e, λRe, λGR}
(see fig. 1) otherwise players have different preferences over agendas.

Agreement arises only for 0 <λ<min {λYeReGR}


B) Let λB < λ < 1, with λB = VEII+")α, then Player 1 demands x1 as in (55)

while in Agenda 2 player 1 obtains the entire surplus. Player 1 prefers agenda 1 if
λ > λ
G with λG = -(1 a) + 2+ + a2 and agenda 2 otherwise, while Player 2 always

prefers agenda 1 unless α<0.5 and λ is in [λY , 1] with λY


(1a)-√ 1 2α
α


. Then,


31




More intriguing information

1. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
2. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
3. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
4. The name is absent
5. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
6. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
7. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
8. Comparative study of hatching rates of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) eggs on different substrates
9. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
10. The Global Dimension to Fiscal Sustainability