Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games



Similarly player 2 prefers agenda 1 when λ is sufficiently large (at the limit λ>λRe

with λRe = αα1(++α-) 1 ), otherwise, he prefers agenda 2. Since in this case λ cannot be
larger than λ
GR , then both players prefer agenda 2 if 0<λ<min {λY e, λRe, λGR}
(see fig. 1) otherwise players have different preferences over agendas.

Agreement arises only for 0 <λ<min {λYeReGR}


B) Let λB < λ < 1, with λB = VEII+")α, then Player 1 demands x1 as in (55)

while in Agenda 2 player 1 obtains the entire surplus. Player 1 prefers agenda 1 if
λ > λ
G with λG = -(1 a) + 2+ + a2 and agenda 2 otherwise, while Player 2 always

prefers agenda 1 unless α<0.5 and λ is in [λY , 1] with λY


(1a)-√ 1 2α
α


. Then,


31




More intriguing information

1. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
2. The name is absent
3. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. XML PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS FOR A COMPANY
7. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
8. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
9. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
10. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness