for λB <λ< 1 and α> 0.5 players never agree over agenda, while for α< 0.5 and
max {λB ,λY } <λ<λG (see fig. 2) both players prefer agenda 2.

Agreement arises for max{λB,λY } <λ<λG
C) Let 1 < λ < α + ʌ/a(l + α), then in agenda 1 player 1 demands x1 as for case
B), while in agenda 2 in equilibrium player 1 obtains ag2 xe1 as defined in (60). In this
case, since λ> 1, it is straightforward to show that player 1 always prefers agenda 1
while player 2 always prefers agenda 2.
D) Let λ>α+ α(1 + α), then player obtains the entire surplus in agenda 1 and
32
More intriguing information
1. MICROWORLDS BASED ON LINEAR EQUATION SYSTEMS: A NEW APPROACH TO COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS2. Perfect Regular Equilibrium
3. The name is absent
4. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
5. On the Real Exchange Rate Effects of Higher Electricity Prices in South Africa
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
9. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
10. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence