El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996



TABLA 5. Cambios en la densidad de empleo 1986-1996 — Efectos espaciales (I)

Total Industria


06 Industria Quimica


07 Metalurgia, Mat. Eléctrico


08 Material de Transporte


5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

0.512**

0.253**

0.026

0.306

-0.239

-0.468

0.827**

0.331

-0.282

0.619**

0.177

-0.194

Constante

(5.84)

(2.54)

(0.19)

(1.12)

(-0.70)

(1.00)

(3.85)

(1.34)

(-0.74)

(2.60)

(0.61)

(-0.53)

d

-0.006**

0.001

0.008*

-0.003

0.011

0.017

-0.011

0.002

0.025*

-0.007

0.005

0.019*

BCN

(-2.17)

(0.41)

(1.93)

(-0.37)

(1.03)

(1.12)

(-1.35)

(0.24)

(1.93)

(-0.96)

(0.62)

(1.65)

-1

1.448**

1.491**

1.528**

2.497**

2.988**

3.092**

1.499**

1.264*

0.893

0.372

1.278*

1.498**

SBD1986

(5.46)

(5.39)

(5.55)

(2.73)

(2.78)

(2.69)

(2.27)

(1.92)

(1.69)

(0.44)

(1.59)

(2.07)

t

-0.036**

-0.036**

-0.038**

-0.044**

-0.052**

-0.050**

-0.045**

-0.042**

-0.050**

-0.048**

-0.046**

-0.044**

tINFR1986

(-6.65)

(-6.97)

(7.36)

(-3.37)

(-3.75)

(-3.78)

(-3.03)

(-2.89)

(-3.27)

(-3.58)

(-3.48)

(-3.44)

In Ч ЛР  lr\A

-0.542**

-0.534**

-0.567**

-0.709**

-0.708**

-0.732**

-0.297**

-0.376**

-0.398**

-0.702**

-0.652**

-0.643**

ln Spe _ locs,1986

(-15.91)

(-17.24)

(-18.31)

(-6.42)

(-8.38)

(-8.18)

(-2.92)

(-4.15)

(-4.65)

(-7.91)

(-8.24)

(-8.16)

In Ml/?  /7 VP At

0.106**

0.136**

0.306**

0.060

-0.118

0.047

-0.258

0.205

0.684**

0.185*

0.090

0.467**

ln Spe _ areas,1986

(2.38)

(3.00)

(5.58)

(0.41)

(-0.93)

(0.22)

(-1.43)

(1.06)

(2.99)

(1.79)

(0.88)

(3.54)

In Λ)∕V IAtA

-0.080

-0.016

-0.057

0.165

0.271

0.165

-0.098

-0.027

-0.039

-0.015

-0.153

-0.324

ln Div _ locs ,1986

(-1.02)

(-0.22)

(-0.75)

(0.56)

(0.95)

(0.55)

(-0.88)

(-0.29)

(-0.43)

(-0.06)

(-0.60)

(-1.20)

In T~)7V AlVPAl

0.118

0.006

0.164*

0.058

-0.045

0.229

0.515*

0.068

0.184*

-0.403

0.237

0.051

ln Div _ areas,1986

(0.70)

(0.05)

(1.75)

(0.16)

(-0.09)

(0.34)

(1.95)

(0.45)

(1.77)

(-1.07)

(0.53)

(0.09)

In /ɔ Iaia

-0.339**

-0.312**

-0.292**

-0.336**

-0.359**

-0.321**

-0.405**

-0.353**

-0.341**

-0.354**

-0.311**

-0.262**

ln D _ loc1986

(-10.45)

(-10.19)

(-9.72)

(-3.21)

(-3.91)

(-3.64)

(-4.37)

(-4.07)

(-4.14)

(-3.89)

(-3.88)

(-3.69)

In If AlVPAl

0.197**

0.262**

0.293**

0.227**

0.433**

0.411**

0.169*

0.240*

0.412**

0.274**

0.340**

0.313**

n _ area1986

................(5.74)................

...............(6.42)................

(5.70)

(2.17)

...............(3.47).................

(2.71)

(1.88)

(1.97)

(2.49)

(2.80)

(2.89)

(2.60)

R 2 Ajustada

0.3744

0.3771

0.3830

0.4172

0.4559

0.4252

0.3086

0.2876

0.3240

0.3667

0.3637

0.3741

Observaciones

1068

150

151

158

**, * Variables significativas a niveles del 5 y 10%, respectivamente.



More intriguing information

1. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
2. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
3. The name is absent
4. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
5. The name is absent
6. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
7. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
8. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent