El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996



TABLA 6. Cambios en la densidad de empleo 1986-1996 — Efectos espaciales (II)

09 Alimentacion


10 Iextil, Cueroy Confeccion


11 Madera, Corcho y Muebles


12 Pape, Artes Graficasy Edicion


5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

Constante

0.282

0.247

-0.359

0.369

-0.034

-0.372

0.537**

0.561**

0.104

0.875**

0.538*

0.138

(1.59)

(1.14)

(-0.79)

(1.42)

(-0.10)

(-0.76)

(2.56)

(2.31)

(0.28)

(3.14)

(1.86)

(0.24)

dBCN

0.001

0.003

0.017

-0.009

0.000

0.012

0.003

0.002

0.012

-0.022**

-0.009

0.006

(0.14)

(0.41)

(1.32)

(-1.10)

(0.05)

(0.83)

(0.55)

(0.28)

(1.21)

(-3.04)

(-0.92)

(0.33)

d -1

0.984**

1.300**

1.354**

2.484**

1.928**

2.251**

1.592**

2.165**

2.186**

1.304**

1.466**

2.405**

SBD1986

(2.00)

(1.98)

(2.09)

(2.57)

(2.16)

(2.03)

(2.20)

(2.59)

(2.26)

(2.24)

(2.74)

(3.64)

tINFR1986

-0.035**

-0.033**

-0.026**

-0.034**

-0.036**

-0.037**

-0.028**

-0.026**

-0.037**

-0.031*

-0.030*

-0.025*

(-2.55)

(-2.35)

(-2.30)

(-2.10)

(-2.30)

(-2.38)

(-2.86)

(-2.48)

(-3.03)

(-1.91)

(-1.92)

(-1.77)

lnSpes,1986

- loc

-0.607**

-0.591**

-0.616**

-0.467**

-0.478**

-0.472**

-0.729**

-0.623**

-0.624**

-0.556**

-0.542**

-0.550**

(-8.57)

(-8.43)

(-9.80)

(-5.18)

(-5.60)

(-5.39)

(-5.60)

(-5.64)

(-5.87)

(-6.91)

(-6.08)

(-6.91)

ln Spes,1986 -

area

0.149

0.134

0.387**

0.056

0.046

0.009

0.231

-0.071

0.418

0.040

0.134

0.485

(1.24)

(0.95)

(2.43)

(0.44)

(0.30)

(0.04)

(1.24)

(-0.40)

(1.35)

(0.37)

(0.75)

(1.63)

ln DIV

- loc

-0.148

-0.111

-0.147

0.216

0.302

0.021

0.209

0.170

0.092

-0.152

-0.014

0.032

ln DIVs,1986

(-0.64)

(-0.48)

(-0.67)

(0.67)

(1.07)

(0.07)

(0.82)

(0.74)

(0.37)

(-0.65)

(-0.06)

(0.13)

ln DIV

area

-0.066

0.244

0.757

-0.244

-1.331*

-0.113

-0.161

-0.062

-0.064

0.533

0.652*

1.240**

ln DIVs,1986 -

(-0.22)

(0.58)

(1.48)

(-0.53)

(-1.76)

(-0.09)

(-0.52)

(-0.18)

(-0.14)

(1.53)

(1.82)

(2.37)

ln Den1986 -

loc

-0.329**

-0.260**

-0.256**

-0.350**

-0.350**

-0.342**

-0.383**

-0.310**

-0.310**

-0.359**

-0.334**

-0.280**

(-4.02)

(-3.21)

(-3.22)

(-3.85)

(-3.79)

(-3.70)

(-4.60)

(-4.28)

(-4.63)

(-4.92)

(-4.67)

(-4.05)

ln Den1986 -

area

0.223**

...............(2.95)................

0.155

...............(1.59)................

0.344*

...............(1.95)...............

0.185*
(1.95)

0.327**
(2.63)

0.407**
(2.49)

0.238**
(2.73)

0.119
(1.37)

0.291**
(2.02)

0.148*

...............(1.67)................

0.228**
(2.44)

0.173
(1.15)

R 2 Ajustada

0.3943

0.3629

0.4031

0.3395

0.3635

0.3642

0.3584

0.3200

0.3258

0.3842

0.3920

0.4108

Observaciones

149

153

154

153

**, * Variables significativas a niveles del 5 y 10%, respectivamente.



More intriguing information

1. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
2. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
7. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
8. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
9. The name is absent
10. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries