El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996



TABLA 6. Cambios en la densidad de empleo 1986-1996 — Efectos espaciales (II)

09 Alimentacion


10 Iextil, Cueroy Confeccion


11 Madera, Corcho y Muebles


12 Pape, Artes Graficasy Edicion


5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

5 Km

8 Km

12 Km

Constante

0.282

0.247

-0.359

0.369

-0.034

-0.372

0.537**

0.561**

0.104

0.875**

0.538*

0.138

(1.59)

(1.14)

(-0.79)

(1.42)

(-0.10)

(-0.76)

(2.56)

(2.31)

(0.28)

(3.14)

(1.86)

(0.24)

dBCN

0.001

0.003

0.017

-0.009

0.000

0.012

0.003

0.002

0.012

-0.022**

-0.009

0.006

(0.14)

(0.41)

(1.32)

(-1.10)

(0.05)

(0.83)

(0.55)

(0.28)

(1.21)

(-3.04)

(-0.92)

(0.33)

d -1

0.984**

1.300**

1.354**

2.484**

1.928**

2.251**

1.592**

2.165**

2.186**

1.304**

1.466**

2.405**

SBD1986

(2.00)

(1.98)

(2.09)

(2.57)

(2.16)

(2.03)

(2.20)

(2.59)

(2.26)

(2.24)

(2.74)

(3.64)

tINFR1986

-0.035**

-0.033**

-0.026**

-0.034**

-0.036**

-0.037**

-0.028**

-0.026**

-0.037**

-0.031*

-0.030*

-0.025*

(-2.55)

(-2.35)

(-2.30)

(-2.10)

(-2.30)

(-2.38)

(-2.86)

(-2.48)

(-3.03)

(-1.91)

(-1.92)

(-1.77)

lnSpes,1986

- loc

-0.607**

-0.591**

-0.616**

-0.467**

-0.478**

-0.472**

-0.729**

-0.623**

-0.624**

-0.556**

-0.542**

-0.550**

(-8.57)

(-8.43)

(-9.80)

(-5.18)

(-5.60)

(-5.39)

(-5.60)

(-5.64)

(-5.87)

(-6.91)

(-6.08)

(-6.91)

ln Spes,1986 -

area

0.149

0.134

0.387**

0.056

0.046

0.009

0.231

-0.071

0.418

0.040

0.134

0.485

(1.24)

(0.95)

(2.43)

(0.44)

(0.30)

(0.04)

(1.24)

(-0.40)

(1.35)

(0.37)

(0.75)

(1.63)

ln DIV

- loc

-0.148

-0.111

-0.147

0.216

0.302

0.021

0.209

0.170

0.092

-0.152

-0.014

0.032

ln DIVs,1986

(-0.64)

(-0.48)

(-0.67)

(0.67)

(1.07)

(0.07)

(0.82)

(0.74)

(0.37)

(-0.65)

(-0.06)

(0.13)

ln DIV

area

-0.066

0.244

0.757

-0.244

-1.331*

-0.113

-0.161

-0.062

-0.064

0.533

0.652*

1.240**

ln DIVs,1986 -

(-0.22)

(0.58)

(1.48)

(-0.53)

(-1.76)

(-0.09)

(-0.52)

(-0.18)

(-0.14)

(1.53)

(1.82)

(2.37)

ln Den1986 -

loc

-0.329**

-0.260**

-0.256**

-0.350**

-0.350**

-0.342**

-0.383**

-0.310**

-0.310**

-0.359**

-0.334**

-0.280**

(-4.02)

(-3.21)

(-3.22)

(-3.85)

(-3.79)

(-3.70)

(-4.60)

(-4.28)

(-4.63)

(-4.92)

(-4.67)

(-4.05)

ln Den1986 -

area

0.223**

...............(2.95)................

0.155

...............(1.59)................

0.344*

...............(1.95)...............

0.185*
(1.95)

0.327**
(2.63)

0.407**
(2.49)

0.238**
(2.73)

0.119
(1.37)

0.291**
(2.02)

0.148*

...............(1.67)................

0.228**
(2.44)

0.173
(1.15)

R 2 Ajustada

0.3943

0.3629

0.4031

0.3395

0.3635

0.3642

0.3584

0.3200

0.3258

0.3842

0.3920

0.4108

Observaciones

149

153

154

153

**, * Variables significativas a niveles del 5 y 10%, respectivamente.



More intriguing information

1. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
2. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
3. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
4. The name is absent
5. Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation*
6. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
7. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
8. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
9. The name is absent
10. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices