Constrained School Choice



B.3(b,c), j*+1 P(Qr,y,ir). Hence, σ(Qr, j*+1) y = σ(Qr,ir). Again a contra-
diction. So, σ(Q
r,j*+1) σ(Qr, ir).]

O2. For all i A^(Qr) with f^‰) f^(i), σ(Qr,i) σ(Qr,j^).

Suppose jr Asr(Qr). Note fs^(jr*) fs^(jr). From O2 (with i = jr) and
O1, σ(Q
r,jr) σ(Qr,j^ ≥ σ(Qr,ir).

Suppose now jr+1 Asr+1 (Qr). Assume σ(Qr, jr+1) < σ(Qr, ir). Then,

jr+1 = ir.                                          (11)

We consider two cases.

Case 1: σ(Qr, ir) σ(Q, ir).

Then, σ(Qr, jr+1) < min{σ(Qr, ir), σ(Q, ir)}. From Lemma B.3(a) it follows that σ(Q, jr+1)
= σ(Q
r, jr+1). So,

σ(Q, jr+1) <σ(Q,ir).                               (12)

However, under TTC(Q), ir is in a cycle with sr+1 and jr+1 is in the last cycle of sr+1.
So, σ(Q, j
r+1) σ(Q, ir), a contradiction to (12).

Case 2: σ(Q, ir) < σ(Qr, ir).

If σ(Qr, jr+1) < σ(Q, ir), then σ(Qr, jr+1) < min{σ(Qr, ir), σ(Q, ir)} which yields the
same contradiction as in Case 1. Therefore, σ(Q, i
r) σ(Qr, jr+1).

From Observation B.1 and the assumption that σ(Qr, jr+1) < σ(Qr, ir) it follows that
for each l
σ(Qr, jr+1), jr+1 / P(Qr, l, ir). From (11) and Lemma B.7 it follows that for
each l with σ(Q, i
r) l σ(Qr, jr+1), F (Q, l, jr+1) = F (Qr, l, jr+1) (as directed paths).
So, by taking l = σ(Q
r, jr+1), we obtain that jr+1’s cycle under TTC(Q) is the same as
under TTC(Q
r). In particular, jr+1 Asr+1 (Qr), a contradiction.

Since both cases give a contradiction we conclude that σ(Qr,jr+1) ≥ σ(Qr,ir).        □

Step 5 There is an X -cycle.

We can assume, without loss of generality, that among the students in {j1 , . . . , jp} student
j
1 is (one of) the last one(s) to be assigned to a school under TTC(Q), i.e.,

σ(Q, j1) σ(Q,jr) for any r {1, . . . ,p}.                       (13)

Suppose fs2 (j1) < fs2 (j2). By definition of j2, school s2 points to student j2 in the
last, q
s2 -th, cycle of s2 under TTC(Q), which o ccurs at step σ(Q, s2). Hence, j1

43



More intriguing information

1. Moffett and rhetoric
2. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
3. The name is absent
4. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
5. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
6. The name is absent
7. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
8. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
9. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
10. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
11. The name is absent
12. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
13. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
14. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
15. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
16. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
17. The Role of Immigration in Sustaining the Social Security System: A Political Economy Approach
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study