Constrained School Choice



B.3(b,c), j*+1 P(Qr,y,ir). Hence, σ(Qr, j*+1) y = σ(Qr,ir). Again a contra-
diction. So, σ(Q
r,j*+1) σ(Qr, ir).]

O2. For all i A^(Qr) with f^‰) f^(i), σ(Qr,i) σ(Qr,j^).

Suppose jr Asr(Qr). Note fs^(jr*) fs^(jr). From O2 (with i = jr) and
O1, σ(Q
r,jr) σ(Qr,j^ ≥ σ(Qr,ir).

Suppose now jr+1 Asr+1 (Qr). Assume σ(Qr, jr+1) < σ(Qr, ir). Then,

jr+1 = ir.                                          (11)

We consider two cases.

Case 1: σ(Qr, ir) σ(Q, ir).

Then, σ(Qr, jr+1) < min{σ(Qr, ir), σ(Q, ir)}. From Lemma B.3(a) it follows that σ(Q, jr+1)
= σ(Q
r, jr+1). So,

σ(Q, jr+1) <σ(Q,ir).                               (12)

However, under TTC(Q), ir is in a cycle with sr+1 and jr+1 is in the last cycle of sr+1.
So, σ(Q, j
r+1) σ(Q, ir), a contradiction to (12).

Case 2: σ(Q, ir) < σ(Qr, ir).

If σ(Qr, jr+1) < σ(Q, ir), then σ(Qr, jr+1) < min{σ(Qr, ir), σ(Q, ir)} which yields the
same contradiction as in Case 1. Therefore, σ(Q, i
r) σ(Qr, jr+1).

From Observation B.1 and the assumption that σ(Qr, jr+1) < σ(Qr, ir) it follows that
for each l
σ(Qr, jr+1), jr+1 / P(Qr, l, ir). From (11) and Lemma B.7 it follows that for
each l with σ(Q, i
r) l σ(Qr, jr+1), F (Q, l, jr+1) = F (Qr, l, jr+1) (as directed paths).
So, by taking l = σ(Q
r, jr+1), we obtain that jr+1’s cycle under TTC(Q) is the same as
under TTC(Q
r). In particular, jr+1 Asr+1 (Qr), a contradiction.

Since both cases give a contradiction we conclude that σ(Qr,jr+1) ≥ σ(Qr,ir).        □

Step 5 There is an X -cycle.

We can assume, without loss of generality, that among the students in {j1 , . . . , jp} student
j
1 is (one of) the last one(s) to be assigned to a school under TTC(Q), i.e.,

σ(Q, j1) σ(Q,jr) for any r {1, . . . ,p}.                       (13)

Suppose fs2 (j1) < fs2 (j2). By definition of j2, school s2 points to student j2 in the
last, q
s2 -th, cycle of s2 under TTC(Q), which o ccurs at step σ(Q, s2). Hence, j1

43



More intriguing information

1. A novel selective 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor prevents human adipogenesis
2. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
3. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
4. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
5. The name is absent
6. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
7. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
8. The name is absent
9. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
10. Importing Feminist Criticism