Table 3. Composition of Rural Industrial Workforce by Ownership
|
_________1995__________ |
__________1988__________ | ||||||
|
Total |
Male |
Female |
Total |
Male |
Female | ||
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) | ||
|
Private Enterprises |
(Percent of Workforce) | ||||||
|
Village Residents |
(1) |
38 |
43 |
30 |
60 |
68 |
47 |
|
Commuters |
(2) |
20 |
19 |
21 |
25 |
16 |
40 |
|
Migrants |
(3) |
42 |
38 |
48 |
15 |
16 |
12 |
|
Collective Enterprises | |||||||
|
Village Residents |
(4) |
54 |
59 |
46 |
79 |
82 |
73 |
|
Commuters |
(5) |
23 |
20 |
29 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
Migrants |
(6) |
23 |
21 |
25 |
6 |
8 |
2 |
Source: Authors’ survey.
37
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
3. The name is absent
4. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
5. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
6. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
7. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
8. The name is absent
9. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
10. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence