Table 3. Composition of Rural Industrial Workforce by Ownership
|
_________1995__________ |
__________1988__________ | ||||||
|
Total |
Male |
Female |
Total |
Male |
Female | ||
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) | ||
|
Private Enterprises |
(Percent of Workforce) | ||||||
|
Village Residents |
(1) |
38 |
43 |
30 |
60 |
68 |
47 |
|
Commuters |
(2) |
20 |
19 |
21 |
25 |
16 |
40 |
|
Migrants |
(3) |
42 |
38 |
48 |
15 |
16 |
12 |
|
Collective Enterprises | |||||||
|
Village Residents |
(4) |
54 |
59 |
46 |
79 |
82 |
73 |
|
Commuters |
(5) |
23 |
20 |
29 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
Migrants |
(6) |
23 |
21 |
25 |
6 |
8 |
2 |
Source: Authors’ survey.
37
More intriguing information
1. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?2. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
3. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
4. The name is absent
5. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
6. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
7. Wounds and reinscriptions: schools, sexualities and performative subjects
8. The name is absent
9. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
10. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7