Table 6. Demand for Commuters and Migrants in Rural Industry
Dependent Variable: |
Percent of Incoming Workers among |
Percent of Commuters among |
Percent of Migrants among Workers | ||||||||||
_______1988 |
_______1995 |
_______1988 |
_______1995 |
_______1988 |
_______1995_______ | ||||||||
OLS |
Tobit |
OLS |
Tobit |
OLS |
Tobit |
OLS |
Tobit |
OLS |
Tobit |
OLS |
Tobit | ||
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) |
(9) |
(10) |
(11) |
(12) | ||
Costs | |||||||||||||
Local Labor Costa |
(1) |
0.013 |
0.007 |
0.013 |
0.013 |
-0.0005 |
-0.03 (0.48) |
-0.002 |
-0.009 |
0.01 |
0.06 |
0.15* |
0.015 |
Lagged Dependent |
(2) |
- |
- |
28.5 |
32.0 |
- |
- |
31.9*** |
38.8** |
- |
- |
49.8*** |
69.0*** |
Industry Featuresb | |||||||||||||
Private Enterprise |
(3) |
17.9** |
29.9** |
4.3 |
5.2 |
3.9 |
10.6 |
7.5 |
6.0 |
13.9* |
70.3** |
-4.19 |
-4.7 |
Light Industry |
(4) |
27.6*** |
50.5*** |
13.8* |
19.8** |
29.2*** |
60.4*** |
11.4* |
19.8** |
-1.6 |
3.0 |
1.66 |
12.3 |
Village Features | |||||||||||||
Size of Labor Force(5) |
-0.03** (2.24) |
-0.05* |
-0.01 (1.06) |
-0.01 |
-0.001 |
-0.02 (0.81) |
-0.02** |
-0.03** |
-0.02 (1.65) |
-0.05 (1.18) |
0.012* |
0.02* | |
Size of Arable |
(6) |
0.01* |
0.02** |
0.0002 |
-0.001 |
0.01** |
0.02** |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.005 |
-0.003 |
-0.004 |
Land |
(2.08) |
(2.39) |
(0.05) |
(0.21) |
(2.21) |
(2.50) |
(0.80) |
(0.46) |
(0.43) |
(0.39) |
(1.09) |
(0.95) | |
F-Stat on |
(7) |
1.7 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.72 |
1.9* |
1.9* |
3.2*** |
3.1*** |
1.3 |
0.8 |
4.8*** |
4.3*** |
Provincial | |||||||||||||
Adj. R-Squared |
(8) |
0.38 |
- |
0.24 |
- |
0.41 |
- |
0.36 |
- |
0.23 |
- |
0.43 |
- |
Absolute value of t-stats in parenthesis; *, **, *** indicate significance at 10, 5 and 1 percent respectively
a The wage male workers commuting out of the village receive. Female and male workers’ wages are highly correlated so cannot be used together. This wage is also not
simultaneously determined with village enterprise hiring decisions since it is observed outside the village.
b Dummy variable for whether the village has a private enterprise or a light industrial enterprise
41
More intriguing information
1. Achieving the MDGs – A Note2. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
6. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
7. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
8. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
9. The name is absent
10. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln