Table 7. Explaining Wages in Rural China__________________________________________________________________________ | ||||||
Dependent Variable: Log Wage | ||||||
_______All Workers_______ |
Male Workers Only |
Female Workers Only | ||||
__________1988 |
1995 |
__________1988 |
1995_________ |
_______1988 |
_______1995 | |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) | |
N |
(707) |
(1143) |
(448) |
(635) |
(259) |
(508) |
Incoming Labora |
(1) 0.08 (1.36) |
0.13 (3.02)*** |
0.04 (0.55) |
0.16 (2.59)*** |
0.18 (1.84)* |
0.09 (1.62) |
Type of Workerb | ||||||
In-Migrant |
(2) -0.19 (1.29) |
-0.34 (4.20)*** |
-0.11 (0.64) |
-0.31 (2.56)** |
-0.38 (1.49) |
-0.36 (3.27)*** |
In-Commuter |
(3) -0.09 (0.73) |
-0.32 (4.13)*** |
-0.02 (0.11) |
-0.24 (2.12)** |
-0.29 (1.37) |
-0.40 (3.75)*** |
Out-Commuter |
(4) -0.19 (2.60)*** |
-0.29 (5.34)*** |
-0.12 (1.36) |
-0.23 (3.08)*** |
-0.34 (2.38)** |
-0.34 (4.46)*** |
Self-Employed |
(5) 0.52 (3.09)*** |
-0.10 (0.91) |
0.56 (2.80)*** |
0.20 (1.12) |
0.55 (1.67) |
-0.02 (0.15) |
Education, Age and Gender | ||||||
% High School Graduated |
(6) 0.31 (2.14)** |
0.30 (2.69)*** |
0.23 (1.15) |
0.23 (1.39) |
0.55 (2.32)** |
0.41 (2.70)*** |
% Middle School Graduated |
(7) 0.16 (2.02)** |
0.22 (3.47)*** |
0.18 (1.72)* |
0.27 (2.81)*** |
0.18 (1.41) |
0.20 (2.48)** |
% Under Age 25 |
(8) -0.24 (3.15)*** |
-0.14 (2.24)** |
-0.22 (2.17)** |
-0.12 (1.22) |
-0.24 (1.99)** |
-0.20 (2.46)** |
% Over Age 50 |
(9) -0.24 (1.48) |
-0.35 (2.53)** |
-0.20 (0.97) |
-0.38 (1.99)** |
-0.30 (1.10) |
-0.33 (1.61) |
Female |
(10) -0.22 (4.10)*** |
-0.28 (6.72)*** |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Employment Sectorc | ||||||
Agriculture |
(11) 0.44 (1.75)* |
0.31 (1.74)* |
0.48 (1.43) |
0.22 (0.86) |
0.44 (1.05) |
0.48 (1.95)* |
Light Industry |
(12) 0.37 (2.28)** |
0.02 (0.18) |
0.34 (1.70)* |
0.004 (0.02) |
0.54 (1.78)* |
0.005 (0.04) |
Heavy Industry |
(13) 0.39 (2.00)** |
0.03 (0.22) |
0.41 (1.81)* |
-0.06 (0.29) |
0.34 (0.82) |
0.19 (0.85) |
Mining |
(14) 0.85 (3.93)*** |
0.14 (0.90) |
0.89 (3.65)*** |
0.21 (1.03) |
0.77 (1.36) |
-0.11 (0.35) |
Construction |
(15) 0.50 (3.08)*** |
0.21 (1.95)** |
0.50 (2.63)*** |
0.24 (1.45) |
0.60 (1.77)* |
0.24 (1.57) |
Transportation |
(16) 0.27 (1.41) |
0.04 (0.37) |
0.24 (0.85) |
0.05 (0.23) |
0.43 (1.29) |
0.003 (0.03) |
Commerce |
(17) 0.43 (2.13)** |
0.12 (0.86) |
0.50 (2.12)** |
0.30 (1.46) |
0.24 (0.59) |
-0.36 (1.57) |
F-Stat on Provincial Dummies |
13.4*** |
33.9*** |
7.0*** |
17.6*** |
7.9*** |
19.4*** |
Adj. R-Squared_____________ |
___________0.27 |
0.30 |
__________0.24 |
0.26__________ |
________0.33 |
________0.33 |
Absolute value of t-stats are in parenthesis, *, **, *** indicate significance at 10, 5 and 1 percent respectively. | ||||||
a Dummy variable for villages that have in-commuters or in-migrants working in village enterprises | ||||||
b Out-migrants are left out as a base | ||||||
c Services are left out as a base |
42
More intriguing information
1. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach2. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
3. European Integration: Some stylised facts
4. The name is absent
5. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
6. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
7. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
8. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
9. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
10. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform