Table 4. Hiring of Rural-to-Rural Migrants by Private Enterprises and Light
Industry________________________________________________________________
|
1995__________ |
__________1988 | ||||
|
Total |
Male Female |
Total Male |
Female | ||
|
(1) |
(2) (3) |
(4) (5) |
(6) | ||
|
Industry Ownership |
(Percent Working in |
Private Enterprises) | |||
|
Village Resident Workers |
(1) |
51 |
51 49 |
38 37 |
38 |
|
Commuters |
(2) |
55 |
58 52 |
56 53 |
60 |
|
Migrants |
(3) |
73 |
73 74 |
65 59 |
83 |
|
Industry Type |
(Percent Working |
in Light Industry) | |||
|
Commuters |
(4) |
27 |
21 36 |
72 49 |
86 |
|
Migrants |
(5) |
65 |
55 78 |
49 45 |
61 |
Source: Authors’ survey.
38
More intriguing information
1. The Mathematical Components of Engineering2. The name is absent
3. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
4. The name is absent
5. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
6. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
7. The name is absent
8. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia
9. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
10. The name is absent