Table 4. Hiring of Rural-to-Rural Migrants by Private Enterprises and Light
Industry________________________________________________________________
|
1995__________ |
__________1988 | ||||
|
Total |
Male Female |
Total Male |
Female | ||
|
(1) |
(2) (3) |
(4) (5) |
(6) | ||
|
Industry Ownership |
(Percent Working in |
Private Enterprises) | |||
|
Village Resident Workers |
(1) |
51 |
51 49 |
38 37 |
38 |
|
Commuters |
(2) |
55 |
58 52 |
56 53 |
60 |
|
Migrants |
(3) |
73 |
73 74 |
65 59 |
83 |
|
Industry Type |
(Percent Working |
in Light Industry) | |||
|
Commuters |
(4) |
27 |
21 36 |
72 49 |
86 |
|
Migrants |
(5) |
65 |
55 78 |
49 45 |
61 |
Source: Authors’ survey.
38
More intriguing information
1. Constructing the Phylomemetic Tree Case of Study: Indonesian Tradition-Inspired Buildings2. The name is absent
3. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
4. The name is absent
5. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
6. The name is absent
7. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
8. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent