Table 1: Average Current and Lagged Wage growth by Type of Intra-firm Mobilitya
Job Change |
Job and Rank Changeb | ||||
No |
Yes |
Upc |
Down |
Same | |
Current Wage Growthd (%) |
1.92 |
6.02 |
16.25 |
3.84 |
2.94 |
Previousd Wage Growth (%) |
(0.001) |
(0.009) |
(0.02) |
(0.04) |
(0.01) |
2.54 |
5.93 |
5.10 |
4.53 |
4.70 | |
Frequencye of Observations |
(0.001) |
(0.008) |
(0.02) |
(0.03) |
(0.01) |
91.6 |
2.9 |
21.7 |
8.2 |
70.1 |
a-Based on a sample of 11159 observations (3487 workers). Standard errors in parenthesis.
b- Rank change conditional on reported intra-firm job change.
c-Rank change up (down or same) is a dummy indicating a higher (lower or same) rank
in period t compared to t-1.
d-Average difference in log wages between t and t-1 for current growth and t-2 and t-1 for
previous wage growth. The period t-1 is the period before reported job (and rank) change.
f-The percentages for the first two columns on job change do not add up to 100 because
frequencies are computed over the total sample which also includes between firms job changers.
Table 2: Averagea Wage Growth by Rank Transitionsb
t |
t-1 |
Low |
Medium |
Upper |
EXec. |
Average |
Low |
All |
0.89 (.002) |
- |
- |
- |
1.610 |
Blue-collar |
0.78 (.002) |
- |
- |
- |
1.674 | |
White-collar |
1.16 (.005) |
- |
- |
- |
1.451 | |
Civil servant |
2.25 (.018) |
- |
- |
- |
2.172 | |
Medium |
All |
15.99 (.008) |
1.83 (.002) |
- |
- |
2.093 |
Blue-collar |
15.82 (.008) |
1.89 (.003) |
- |
- |
2.105 | |
White-collar |
16.19 (.0i5) |
1.74 (.003) |
- |
- |
2.054 | |
Civil servant |
14.43 (.062) |
2.42(.006) |
- |
- |
2.430 | |
Upper |
All |
- |
18.93 (.015) |
2.37 (.004) |
- |
3.287 |
Blue-collar |
- |
22.08 (.026) |
1.10 (.011) |
- |
2.548 | |
White-collar |
- |
19.06 (.020) |
2.70 (.005) |
- |
3.537 | |
Civil servant |
- |
9.05 (.025) |
2.35 (.006) |
- |
3.160 | |
EXec. |
All |
- |
- |
18.10 (.030) |
3.33 (.005) |
4.106 |
Blue-collar |
- |
- |
31.1 (.160) |
8.48 (.024) |
2.860 | |
White-collar |
- |
- |
16.65 (.035) |
4.12 (.010) |
4.331 | |
Civil servant |
- |
- |
14.73 (.018) |
2.52 (.006) |
4.174 |
a-Based on a sample of 11159 observations (3487 workers). Standard errors in parenthesis.
b-Transitions from rank j in period t — 1 to rank j' > j in period t ,j,j' =(L,M,U,EX).
c-Monthly wage (after tax) in levels in thousands of marks. Average over all workers in rank j at time t.
30
More intriguing information
1. MICROWORLDS BASED ON LINEAR EQUATION SYSTEMS: A NEW APPROACH TO COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS2. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
3. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach
4. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
5. The name is absent
6. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
7. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
8. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
9. Federal Tax-Transfer Policy and Intergovernmental Pre-Commitment
10. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry