Table 7. Endogenous Growth Model with Diagnostics for Spatial Models.
|
Sectors Models a Variables |
Total | |||
|
OLS |
_____GM-HET |
OLS | ||
|
Low |
High | |||
|
Constant |
-0.270*** |
-0.318** |
-0.134 |
-0.052 |
|
Human capital |
0.012*** |
0.017*** |
0.014*** |
-0.031 |
|
Spillover human capital |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.003 |
0.022 |
|
Spatial domestic effect |
-0.009 |
-0.037** |
-0.003 |
0.052*** |
|
Catch-up |
0.011*** |
0.024*** |
0.009 |
0.012*** |
|
Log labor ratio |
-0.880*** |
-1.087*** |
-0.436 |
1.082 |
|
Log capital ratio |
0.421*** |
0.516*** |
0.177 |
-0.516 |
|
Spatial AR parameter13 |
0.325*** | |||
|
R2 adjusted |
0.76 |
0.36 | ||
|
AIC |
-121.23 |
28.01 | ||
|
LIK |
67.61 |
-7.00 | ||
|
JBc |
1.03 |
3.79 | ||
|
BPd |
8.42 |
4.35 | ||
|
Chow-Walde |
7.91 | |||
|
I |
0∣γ- ■ ■ |
0.12** | ||
|
LM-error |
2.56* |
1.38 | ||
|
Robust LM-error |
1.71 |
2.47 | ||
|
LM-Iag |
1.10 |
0.28 | ||
|
Robust LM-Iag |
0.25 |
1.38 | ||
|
LM-SARMA__________ |
_________2.81 |
________2.76 | ||
,' Significance at the 1, 5 and 10% level is signaled by ***, ** and *, respectively,
b Spatial Autoregressive parameter of the spatial error model.
cJarque Bera test for normality of the errors.
d Breusch-Pagan test with random coefficients as the alternative hypothesis.
c Chow-Wald test for stability of coefficients across regimes.
|
Mining__________________ |
Constmction | |||
|
______GM-HET______ |
OLS |
_____GM-HET | ||
|
Low |
High |
Low |
High | |
|
1.280 |
-0.506 |
-0.250 |
-0.178 |
-0.303 |
|
-0.036 |
-0.020 |
-0.003 |
-0.012 |
0.005 |
|
-0.015 |
0.041 |
0.012 |
0.010 |
0.015 |
|
-0.007 |
0.017 |
-0.010 |
0.009 |
-0.032 |
|
0.014*** 0.028** |
0.010 |
0.004 |
0.030 | |
|
0.022 |
-0.347 |
.ɪ 464*** |
-1.282** |
-0.956* |
|
-0.170 |
0.013 |
0.732*** |
0.672*** |
0.477* |
|
0.460*** |
-0.440*** | |||
|
0.48 | ||||
|
-59.51 | ||||
|
36.75 | ||||
|
9 93*** | ||||
|
9.93 | ||||
|
4.52 |
4.67 | |||
0.10*
0.73
2.51
0.01
1.78
2.51
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
3. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
4. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
5. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
6. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
7. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
8. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
9. The name is absent
10. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt