42 Interventions for HCHHHU: technical report
Section J: Economic analysis Quality Assessment
J.1 Were all important costs and /or benefits identified
J.1.1 High (Yes all)
J.1.2 Medium (Most but not all)
J.1.3 Low (minimal)
Likely to lead to serious deficiencies in estimates
J.2 Was measurement of costs and benefits sufficiently accurate
J.2.1 High
Source data credible & appropriate
Imputation of financial values for non cash costs
reasonable
J.2.2 Medium
Some doubts about sources of financial estimates and or
process of deriving cash values
J.2.3 Low
Sources of finance data lack credibility and/or process
of deriving cash values likely to lead to systematic bias
(over or under estimates )
J.3 Was appropriate adjustment made for differential timing
J.3.1 High
Not applicable or appropriate adjustments made
J.3.2 Medium
Some adjustments made but not on all costs/ benefits
J.3.3 Low
No adjustments made when were required leading to
bias in financial estimates (over or under estimating)
J.4 Was appropriate sensitivity analysis undertaken
J.4.1 High
Sensitivity analysis on all key costs/ benefits estimates
undertaken
J.4.2 Medium
Sensitivity analysis undertaken for some estimates
Estimates given with confidence intervals
J.4.3 Low
No sensitivity analysis undertaken
J.5 Overall rating for quality of economic analysis
Should reflect answers to questions above
J.5.1 High
J.5.2 Medium
J.5.3 Low