The name is absent

In some studies it is difficult to distinguish between
the findings of the study and the conclusions. In those
cases, please code the trustworthiness of this combined
results/conclusion.

Consider your answers to questions F9, F13, F14, F15,
F17, H3 & H4

I.4.1 High trustworthiness (please specify)

I.4.2 Medium trustworthiness (please specify)

I.4.3 Low trustworthiness (please specify)

I.5.1 Not applicable (results and conclusions inseparable)

I.5.2 High trustworthiness

I.5.3 Medium trustworthiness

I.5.4 Low trustworthiness

Please state what any difference is.

I.6.1 Not applicable (no difference in conclusions)

I.6.2 Yes (please specify)

Please specify basis for this judgement.

I.7.1 High

Maryland Scale score = 5

I.7.2 Medium

Maryland scale score = 3 & 4

I.7.3 Low

Maryland Scale Score = 1 or 2

This question is about the relevance of the study to the
in-depth review question.

Take into account your answers in Section D (i.e.
information about the coordination/ integration effort)
and question E9 (the HCHHHU)

Studies where little information is provided to answer
these questions and/or coordination/ integration is only
a small part of the study should be graded lower

I.8.1 High

I.8.2 Medium

I.8.3 Low

Overall Weight of Evidence D =

WOE A + WOE B + WOE C/ 3

Where High = 3, Medium = 2, Low = 1

Except that WOE D cannot be higher than Weight of
Evidence B

I.9.1 High

I.9.2 Medium

I.9.3 Low