225
Table 7.2.1: Percentages of pupils attributing their good or average at mathematics to
the following factors
I=Ability |
2=Effort |
3=Luck |
4=Teacher |
5=Home |
6=Easy |
7=0thers | |
5tn graders |
^31 (2.7%) |
^364 |
~92 (7.9%) |
269 |
381 |
35 |
— |
8tn graders |
58 (5.1 %) |
411 |
158 |
193 |
208 |
47 |
^59 |
5th and 8th graders who reported themselves as Poor or Very poor at mathematics were
asked to choose one possible reason for failure from six alternatives: lack of ability, lack
of effort, lack of luck, lack of teacher support, lack of home support and task difficulty. A
space was left for 8th graders to write an alternative reason for being poor at
mathematics. The majority of 8th graders attributed their being poor at mathematics to
lack of effort. Effort-based attribution in failure was found more at 8th grade than 5th
grade. 5th graders were more likely to attribute their being poor at mathematics to lack of
ability. Effort-based attributions of 8th graders and ability-based attributions of 5th graders
manifested among the pupils perceiving themselves poor at mathematics were greater
than for pupils perceiving themselves good or average at mathematics. Slightly more
than one tenth of 5th graders attributed their being poor at mathematics to task difficulty.
Fewer 8th graders gave task-based attributions. Pupils from both age groups attributing
their being poor at mathematics to lack of luck, lack of teacher support or lack of home
support were very few. Approximately one tenth of 8th graders described their attribution
of failure in their own words. Those attributions were ‘I am not interested in mathematics
(3.3%)’, ‘I often make tiny mistakes (2.7%)’ ‘I can’t develop my understanding (1.1%)’, ‘I
don’t know how to learn mathematics effectively (0.6%)’ and ‘others (2.7%)’ (see Table
7.2.2).
Table 7.2.2: Percentages of pupils attributing their poor at mathematics to the following
factors
Lack of |
Lack of |
Lack of Luck |
Lack of |
Lack of |
Task |
Others | |
5" graders |
88 (35.9%) |
97 (39.6%) |
9 (3.7%) |
7 (2.9%) |
10(4.1%) |
34(13.9%) |
— |
8tn graders |
88 (10.8%) |
487 |
16(2.0%) |
55 (6.8%) |
24 (2.9%) |
58 (7.1%) |
~86 (10.4%) |
225
More intriguing information
1. Portuguese Women in Science and Technology (S&T): Some Gender Features Behind MSc. and PhD. Achievement2. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
3. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
4. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
5. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
6. The name is absent
7. SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES
8. The name is absent
9. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
10. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.