5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



225

Table 7.2.1: Percentages of pupils attributing their good or average at mathematics to
the following factors

I=Ability

2=Effort

3=Luck

4=Teacher
support

5=Home
Support

6=Easy
Task

7=0thers

5tn graders

^31

(2.7%)

^364
(31.0%)

~92

(7.9%)

269
(23.0%)

381
(32.4%)

35
(3.1%)

8tn graders

58

(5.1 %)

411
(36.3%)

158
(13.9%)

193
(17.0%)

208
(18.4%)

47
(4.1%)

^59
(5.2%)

5th and 8th graders who reported themselves as Poor or Very poor at mathematics were
asked to choose one possible reason for failure from six alternatives: lack of ability, lack
of effort, lack of luck, lack of teacher support, lack of home support and task difficulty. A
space was left for 8th graders to write an alternative reason for being poor at
mathematics. The majority of 8th graders attributed their being poor at mathematics to
lack of effort. Effort-based attribution in failure was found more at 8th grade than 5th
grade. 5th graders were more likely to attribute their being poor at mathematics to lack of
ability. Effort-based attributions of 8th graders and ability-based attributions of 5th graders
manifested among the pupils perceiving themselves poor at mathematics were greater
than for pupils perceiving themselves good or average at mathematics. Slightly more
than one tenth of 5th graders attributed their being poor at mathematics to task difficulty.
Fewer 8th graders gave task-based attributions. Pupils from both age groups attributing
their being poor at mathematics to lack of luck, lack of teacher support or lack of home
support were very few. Approximately one tenth of 8th graders described their attribution
of failure in their own words. Those attributions were ‘I am not interested in mathematics
(3.3%)’, ‘I often make tiny mistakes (2.7%)’ ‘I can’t develop my understanding (1.1%)’, ‘I
don’t know how to learn mathematics effectively (0.6%)’ and ‘others (2.7%)’ (see Table
7.2.2).

Table 7.2.2: Percentages of pupils attributing their poor at mathematics to the following
factors

Lack of
Ability

Lack of
Effort

Lack of

Luck

Lack of
Teacher
Support

Lack of
Home
Support

Task
Difficulty

Others

5" graders

88 (35.9%)

97 (39.6%)

9 (3.7%)

7 (2.9%)

10(4.1%)

34(13.9%)

8tn graders

88 (10.8%)

487
(59.8%)

16(2.0%)

55 (6.8%)

24 (2.9%)

58 (7.1%)

~86

(10.4%)

225



More intriguing information

1. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
2. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
3. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
4. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
5. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
6. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
7. The name is absent
8. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
9. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
10. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”
11. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
12. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
13. The name is absent
14. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
15. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
16. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
17. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
18. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
19. The name is absent
20. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry