The name is absent



Table 4 Changes in US and US partner applied tariffs, bound tariffs, preferential tariffs, nontariff

barriers, and transportation costs

Subject

Rate in 1980

(percent)

Rate in 1990

(percent)

Rate in 2004

(percent)

Percentage
point change

US MFN applied tariffs

ND

5.7

3.8

-2.0

US partner MFN applied tariffs

ND

10.3

7.4

-2.9

AVE of US import transportation costs

4.3

3.7

3.2

-1.1

AVE of US export transportation costs

4.3

3.7

3.2

-1.1

US bound rates (Tokyo to Uruguay)

6.0

6.0

4.1

-2.0

US partner bound rates (Tokyo to

Uruguay)

17.9

17.9

13.5

-4.4

AVE of US nontariff barriers

ND

15.4

7.5

-7.9

AVE of partner nontariff barriers

ND

20.5

10.3

-10.2

US actual tariffs (including preferential)

ND

5.3

2.5

-2.8

US partner actual tariffs (including
preferential)

ND

9.4

3.9

-5.4

ND = no data available; AVE = ad valorem equivalent

Note: To derive "past" US nontariff barrier rates, a 51.1 percent increase from "present" rates is used as a discounting factor.

Sources: UN Comtrade Database via WITS (2008); TRAINS Database via WITS (2008); Hummels (2007); WTO (2008); Kee, Nicita, and

Olarreaga (2005); authors' calculations.

22



More intriguing information

1. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
2. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
3. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
4. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
5. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
6. The name is absent
7. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
8. Robust Econometrics
9. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study
10. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament